Re: 10.6 planning

2020-09-09 Thread Andy Simpkins
I can do either and have no preferance. /Andy On 9 September 2020 19:24:06 BST, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: >Hi all, > >We're slightly off our previous schedule because of delaying 10.5, but >we should really get on with arranging 10.6. > >Please could you confirm your availability, and any

Re: stretch EOL point release (9.13) and 10.5 planning

2020-07-18 Thread Andy Simpkins
On 18 July 2020 22:39:05 BST, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:12:41PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >>On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 15:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 12:46 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>> > Argh, massive apologies... >>> >

Re: stretch EOL point release (9.13) and 10.5 planning

2020-06-15 Thread Andy Simpkins
On 15/06/20 19:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Adam D. Barratt (2020-06-15): >> To get the ball rolling, please could you confirm your availability >> for: >> >> - July 11/12 >> - July 18/19 > > > Anyway, I should be available, whatever date(s) get picked. > Preferance would be the

Re: Debian 10.3 XFCE from torrent failed verification (FALSE ALARM)

2020-05-09 Thread Andy Simpkins
Hi Jason You might want to wait a few hours. we are in the middle of 10.4 release right now. So expext 10.4 XFCE. To be availabe today (overnight?) Cheers On 9 May 2020 13:38:06 BST, Jason Quinn wrote: >Thanks Steve for the quick reply. > >You are correct. My report appears to be a false

Re: Default security sources are slow very much.

2020-02-06 Thread Andy Simpkins
I stand corrected. I learned somthing new today Thanks On 6 February 2020 12:54:03 GMT, Ian Campbell wrote: >On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 07:41 +0000, Andy Simpkins wrote: >> It isn't safe to mirror security patches because we can not assure >> the integrity of the updates on

Re: Default security sources are slow very much.

2020-02-05 Thread Andy Simpkins
Sorry. No. It isn't safe to mirror security patches because we can not assure the integrity of the updates on a mirror server. We are aware that bandwidth is limited either for financial or geographic reasons.This is why you can install from local media without network access. However

Re: Debootstrap Aarch64 base system.not include package haveged

2020-02-05 Thread Andy Simpkins
What are the many errors you are seeing? From what I recall things take a while (in the case of some platforms without a HRND enabled that can be several hours) to buuld up enough entropy before some services (such as sshd) can successfully start. I agree that havegd will help here. But is

Re: Set root password will not install sudo

2020-02-05 Thread Andy Simpkins
You also have a user account as well. So you can, and should, log in using that. On 5 February 2020 01:22:56 GMT, ykla wrote: >If you set root password when you installs debian, then system will not >install package sudo. But debian ban root login default. So install CD >should install sudo

Re: Planning 10.3 and 9.12

2020-01-07 Thread Andy Simpkins
I can do any of these. Probably best avoid FOSDEM though. /Andy On 6 January 2020 21:42:29 GMT, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: >Hi, > >It's (really past) time to consider a date for the next point releases >for buster and stretch. > >I've listed some suggested dates below; please indicate which you

Bug#941333: Wifi network detection during installation. Suggested improvement.

2019-09-28 Thread Andy Simpkins
Right now you would get a "no network device found" / "no netwirk found" / "unable obtain an IP address" message. Is this not sufficiant? You are given the option to go back and try again. Please remember that it is also possible that no wifi device wiuld have been detected either. Lets face

Re: Missing Firmware

2019-08-20 Thread Andy Simpkins
On 19/08/19 17:00, slow_sp...@att.net wrote: > You may be interested to know that the iso's listed at > https://cdimage.debian.org/images/unofficial/non-free/images-including-firmware/10.0.0-live+nonfree/amd64/iso-hybrid/ > > are missing some firmware information. > > I selected the

Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

2019-07-29 Thread Andy Simpkins
Ok I'll mark it on family calendar On 29 July 2019 10:47:09 GMT-03:00, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Ok, we have a winner. Let's make them both 7th September so press >aren't >under too much pressure. > >-- >Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org >Debian Developer

Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

2019-07-20 Thread Andy Simpkins
Either wfm thanks On 21 July 2019 00:36:30 BST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 07:35:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> - August 24th > >I have no idea how I missed the event that weekend... > >> - Auguest 31st >> - September 7th > >These look like the two options so

Re: Dropping older, less-secure checksums files

2019-07-16 Thread Andy Simpkins
I wouldn't object to dropping the older hashes completely On 16 July 2019 16:04:28 BST, Holger Levsen wrote: >On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 03:58:13PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> ...I'm looking >> into dropping generation of the older, less secure MD5 and SHA1 >> checksums. I'm planning on

Testing release images - Call for help

2019-06-30 Thread Andy Simpkins
Hi there, We have the release of Buster scheduled to happen next Saturday. As always on a release day new iso images are generated and *before* they get signed we try and smoke test them to make sure that the builds went ok and nothing critical is missing from the manifests. We do the same for

Re: Same hashfiles for files that should be different from each other?

2019-03-30 Thread Andy Simpkins
On 30/03/2019 10:16, Andy Simpkins wrote: On 30/03/2019 09:56, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, i wrote: The same checksum duplicity can be seen with    5849124a0e25d1318a880e98b9a8123f debian-live-9.8.0-amd64-cinnamon.contents    5849124a0e25d1318a880e98b9a8123f debian-live-9.8.0-amd64

Re: Same hashfiles for files that should be different from each other?

2019-03-30 Thread Andy Simpkins
On 30/03/2019 09:56, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, i wrote: The same checksum duplicity can be seen with 5849124a0e25d1318a880e98b9a8123f debian-live-9.8.0-amd64-cinnamon.contents 5849124a0e25d1318a880e98b9a8123f debian-live-9.8.0-amd64-gnome.contents Andy Simpkins wrote

Re: Same hashfiles for files that should be different from each other?

2019-03-30 Thread Andy Simpkins
On 30/03/2019 08:49, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, (Cc-ing debian-l...@lists.debian.org) Evert Kuijpers wrote to debian-cd: Both debian-live-9.8.0-i386-lxde.contents and debian-live-9.8.0-i386-mate.contents have all the same hashes. Both debian-live-9.8.0-amd64-lxde.contents and

Re: Scheduling 9.9

2019-02-21 Thread Andy Simpkins
On 20/02/19 18:28, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > Please indicate your availablility out of: > > - April 13 > - April 20 (Easter weekend) Sorry I am away for the above two weekends > - April 27 Can do > /Andy