On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:14:31PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> In fact, how about: we *could* go ahead with the 10.9 point release as
> already planned, and expect to do a 10.10 a couple of weeks later with
> basically *just* the shim/SB changes? I'm OK to go with that option if
> that's our
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:42:29PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's (really past) time to consider a date for the next point releases
> for buster and stretch.
>
> I've listed some suggested dates below; please indicate which you would
> be available for.
>
> - January 25th
> -
Moving over to debian-cd.
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 04:43:26AM +1000, Rick B wrote:
> Hi "Deb and Ian"
> Please redirect if this isn't your responsibility.
>
> I found file debian-live-9.9.0-amd64-xfce+nonfree.iso.torrent
> on
>
On 1/28/19 8:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 18:44 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> 9.7 is a bit overdue already (current events being a bit of a time-
>> sink).
>>
>> Please indicate your availablility out of:
>>
>> - (Feb 2 unlikely, FOSDEM)
>> - Feb 9
>> - Feb 16
>
On 08/13/2018 01:57 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 10:56:59AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> => Question: should we restrict architectures we build images for?
>
> Probably. I'm only thinking x86, arm64 and maybe armhf. Wait for
> people to ask for others and add on a
Hi,
we shipped 9.3 a couple of months ago, so we're overdue for 9.4.
Can you please let us know your availability on the following:
- March 3
- March 10
- March 17
- March 24
- March 31
Thanks,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
It's time to start thinking about our next stable point release. Here
are some dates, please let us know which ones would work.
* April 8-9
* April 15-16
* April 22-23
* April 29-30
* May 6-7
I know at least Adam can't do 15-16 so that one is most likely out anyway.
Cheers,
Julien
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 14:19:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're overdue for the next jessie point release. Here are some possible
> dates, please reply with availability.
>
Thanks all for the quick replies. Let's plan for 8.7 on Jan 14th/15th.
Cheers,
Julien
Hi,
we're overdue for the next jessie point release. Here are some possible
dates, please reply with availability.
Jan 7th/8th
Jan 14th/15th
Jan 21st/22nd
Jan 28th/29th - Cambridge BSP, probably not ideal
Feb 4th/5th - FOSDEM, probably not great either
Feb 11th/12th
Thanks,
Julien
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 23:04:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> September 3rd/4th
>
Won't work for me.
> September 10th/11th
>
> September 17th/18th
>
Should be ok.
Cheers,
Julien
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.5) is scheduled for Saturday,
June 4th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Cheers,
Julien
Hi,
The next (and last) point release for "wheezy" (7.11) is scheduled for
Saturday, June 4th. Processing of new uploads into
wheezy-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Cheers,
Julien
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 20:20:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to
> avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around
> the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them bot
Hi,
with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to
avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around
the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the
same Saturday again.
Some suggested dates:
June 4th/5th
June 11th/12th
June
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:24:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing
> both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD
> team seem happy to try it again.
>
> Some suggested dates:
>
> March 12th /
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 19:52:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some
potential September dates:
5/6th - okay for me
12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon
19th/20th - looks okay
26th/27th -
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 23:09:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
- Oct 12-13
- Oct 19-20
Either of those is fine for me.
Alright, let's go for
Oct 12-13: 7.3
Oct 19-20: 6.0.8
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:17:54 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 23:09:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
- Oct 12-13
- Oct 19-20
Either of those is fine for me.
Alright, let's go for
Oct 12-13: 7.3
Obviously I meant 7.2...
Oct 19-20: 6.0.8
Hi,
we should start thinking about dates for the 7.2 and 6.0.8 point
releases. Which week-ends in the coming months would work for
ftpmaster, press and cd? (We'd need one date for stable and another
later for oldstable.)
Anything particular that needs to happen on either the kernel or d-i
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 14:26:04 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi,
From debian-cd testing we have some things to perhaps add to the errata[0]:
* DVD-1 doesn't offer a choice of desktop environment; it will install the
default (GNOME; or on kfreebsd, XFCE).
I don't think that's a
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 16:58:41 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:49:54PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 14:26:04 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi,
From debian-cd testing we have some things to perhaps add to the
errata[0]:
* DVD
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:38:55 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Ah, I missed a Catalan update because translators didn't update the
PO-Revision-Date properly.
This is a fix for ŀl -- l·l which Catalan translators did
everywhere in the installer. I guess they want it.
IIRC Jordi said this
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 22:32:36 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (05/03/2013):
efivars from 3.2.39-2 will fail to load against the kernel from
3.2.35-2. That basically breaks installation on UEFI from amd64
netboot.
That one is slightly annoying… I
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 23:54:18 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Questions:
A. if we build a debian-installer package against the old linux kernel
ABI, and then images with that debian-installer, will the installer
be able to install a kernel with the old ABI to begin with, *and* a
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 21:50:44 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
* Linux kernel installation fails on old x86 processors (earlier
than 686, or 686 without PAE) (#672611).
Should just be 686 without PAE I think, older CPUs would get the 486
flavour, not 686.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 15:32:50 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
Starting with Debian Squeeze, there will be (more) download options/locations
for CD images, be them netinst/complete/etc. In particular, users of specific
pieces of hardware will
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 16:06:21 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
retitle 557245 debian-cd changes for the squeeze release notes
thanks
Here's my suggested diff for the release notes. I've moved the
discussion about CDs into a separate section, plus:
* update the numbers (CDs/DVDs/BDs)
*
reassign 598062 apt-setup
forcemerge 598130 598062
kthxbye
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 20:33:17 +0200, Lionel Kaufmann wrote:
I've isolated as far as I can, the piece of code involved.
Relatated to grub-installer and apt-install...
You can link to new bug report : #598130 or just close.
reassign 568088 linux-2.6 2.6.26-21
severity 568088 important
tag 568088 moreinfo
kthxbye
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 22:46:28 +0100, Volodymyr Shcherbyna wrote:
Package: cdrom
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After installation of debian 5.0.3 x64 the OS does not
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 21:12:27 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
We are generating a list with each build where things are
dropped. There are currently 3 cases for the CD sets:
1. On the KDE and xfce/lxde CD sets, we configure
MAX_PKG_SIZE=3 (aka 300 MB) and that catches 1
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 17:57:00 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
package: release-notes
x-debbugs-cc: debian-cd@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org
On Freitag, 20. November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
For now, I've added a cutoff of 300,000,000 bytes as a maximum package
size for
Hi,
one nitpick:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 13:33:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
+shift $(expr $OPTIND - 1)
maybe 'shift $((OPTIND - 1))' so you don't fork expr?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
32 matches
Mail list logo
