Re: (Almost) Time for Jessie Beta 2?

2014-09-10 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:18:14AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

[ And -cd@ so that the team knows a release is planned “soon”, in case
some patches are in the works. ]

ACK. I still want to get some stuff done on the EFI front, but my
stack is a bajillion deep at the moment... :-(

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Every time you use Tcl, God kills a kitten. -- Malcolm Ray


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140910144214.gk24...@einval.com



(Almost) Time for Jessie Beta 2?

2014-09-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi people,

as you might have seen, a number of uploads happened lately and the d-i
BoF notes from DebConf kindly provided by Steve (thanks!) reminded me
about uploading d-i more often. So I think I'll try and achieve that as
soon as linux 3.16 reaches testing (it was just uploaded to unstable,
and FTBFSes on several architectures, so not this week ;)).

Some things got set into motion, like syslinux menu overhaul (mainly
discussion around the switch to graphical by default, didn't see any
patch yet) or tasksel changes (alternative desktops, blends support).
I'm unsure they're going to be ready at that point, so I guess it would
make sense not to wait for them and publish another release in the
meanwhile. I'll probably gather opinions when linux is ready, this mail
is mainly meant to be a heads-up.

→ I'd like to know whether some bugs need special attention/fixes
  (besides what's in unstable already).

I haven't looked at recent bugs lately but I think we might be missing
at least a ttf-cjk-compact-udeb upload (which might explain some issues
reported against debian-edu IIRC), and I failed to upload choose-mirror
for the past release (Aurelien uploaded it 10 days ago though, to get
updated arch lists).

If you have possibly disruptive patches/updates pending, it would be
nice to either communicate on the topic, or delay these until after the
release. (Of course, if you're able to introduce them, and fix any
issues before linux is ready, I'm fine with it.)

[ I'm adding -bsd@ to the loop explicitly since there was quite some
work lately (thanks to Steven who stepped up and quickly sent a fair
number of patches), and I'd rather avoid forgetting/not knowing about
some extra patches. ]

[ And -cd@ so that the team knows a release is planned “soon”, in case
some patches are in the works. ]

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: (Almost) Time for Jessie Beta 2?

2014-09-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi,

On 09/09/14 23:18, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
 as you might have seen, a number of uploads happened lately and the d-i
 BoF notes from DebConf kindly provided by Steve (thanks!) reminded me
 about uploading d-i more often.

Sounds good;  it feels like a good time for a new release.  (Perhaps
biased;  I'm keen for the kfreebsd d-i Beta 1 images to go away so that
people are only testing new ones. that work.)

 So I think I'll try and achieve that as
 soon as linux 3.16 reaches testing (it was just uploaded to unstable,
 and FTBFSes on several architectures, so not this week ;)).

We'd be ready for kfreebsd 10.1 to go into unstable, but won't do this
unless there's an ACK/NAK from release team in #760114, and also working
around the schedule of any upcoming d-i release.

If this did go ahead, only the version and ABI number need updating in
debian-installer;  I've been doing all of my d-i testing with kfreebsd
10.1 udebs and I think it is absolutely ready.  (Preferred, in fact,
because it fixes known issues like #755739).

 If you have possibly disruptive patches/updates pending, it would be
 nice to either communicate on the topic, or delay these until after the
 release. (Of course, if you're able to introduce them, and fix any
 issues before linux is ready, I'm fine with it.)

I'd like to revert some of the problematic ZFS-on-Linux changes from
partman-zfs (a kfreebsd-specific udeb), to restore the original
behaviour we had in wheezy.  I'll try to get this done in plenty of time
for Beta 2.

 [ I'm adding -bsd@ to the loop explicitly since there was quite some
 work lately (thanks to Steven who stepped up and quickly sent a fair
 number of patches), and I'd rather avoid forgetting/not knowing about
 some extra patches. ]

Thanks :)  All patches for the kfreebsd d-i Beta 2 errata got uploaded.
 There is only the #757986 inappropriate ioctl for device prompt, that
we could try to fix before Beta 2 *if* there is time after the above.

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: (Almost) Time for Jessie Beta 2?

2014-09-09 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
 Hi people,
 
 as you might have seen, a number of uploads happened lately and the d-i
 BoF notes from DebConf kindly provided by Steve (thanks!) reminded me
 about uploading d-i more often. So I think I'll try and achieve that as
 soon as linux 3.16 reaches testing (it was just uploaded to unstable,
 and FTBFSes on several architectures, so not this week ;)).


I'm still in the upload fast, upload often mood. We nearly have no
pending changes in git (I still need to see today's check, though).

There are many pending l10n-only uploads to do, mostly because Joe
Hansen did a lot of QA on the Danish translation, which triggered
changes to many packages (and also because the chek I'm using was
broken since late July and fixed only recently. They are low priority,
though, and should not delay a release. I just want to mention them so
that you're not surprised by many uploads happening.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature