El Jue 09 Ene 2003 23:20, Marcel Kunath escribió:
> I am not sure if we are talking about the same thing here. I looked at:
>
> http://non-us.cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/3.0_r1/jigdo/i386/
>
> and all I can see is 3.0r1 iso images.
>
> I am looking for a single iso image that includes
>
> the dif
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 09:20:54AM +1100, Marcel Kunath wrote:
>
>I am not sure if we are talking about the same thing here. I looked at:
>
>http://non-us.cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/3.0_r1/jigdo/i386/
>
>and all I can see is 3.0r1 iso images.
>
>I am looking for a single iso image that includes
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:41:31PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> >Marcel Kunath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-09 10:54:05 +1100]:
> >>
> >> If a Debian guru can come up with a way to create a
> >>
> >> Debian 3.0r0 -> 3.0r1 Update CD
> >>
> >> then we a
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:41:31PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> >Marcel Kunath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-09 10:54:05 +1100]:
> >>
> >> If a Debian guru can come up with a way to create a
> >>
> >> Debian 3.0r0 -> 3.0r1 Update CD
> >>
> >> then we a
El Jue 09 Ene 2003 23:20, Marcel Kunath escribió:
> I am not sure if we are talking about the same thing here. I looked at:
>
> http://non-us.cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/3.0_r1/jigdo/i386/
>
> and all I can see is 3.0r1 iso images.
>
> I am looking for a single iso image that includes
>
> the dif
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 09:20:54AM +1100, Marcel Kunath wrote:
>
>I am not sure if we are talking about the same thing here. I looked at:
>
>http://non-us.cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/3.0_r1/jigdo/i386/
>
>and all I can see is 3.0r1 iso images.
>
>I am looking for a single iso image that includes
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:41:31PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>Marcel Kunath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-09 10:54:05 +1100]:
>>
>> If a Debian guru can come up with a way to create a
>>
>> Debian 3.0r0 -> 3.0r1 Update CD
>>
>> then we are most happy to supply this disc to our Debian customers.
>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:41:31PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>Marcel Kunath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-09 10:54:05 +1100]:
>>
>> If a Debian guru can come up with a way to create a
>>
>> Debian 3.0r0 -> 3.0r1 Update CD
>>
>> then we are most happy to supply this disc to our Debian customers.
>
Marcel Kunath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-09 10:54:05 +1100]:
>
> If a Debian guru can come up with a way to create a
>
> Debian 3.0r0 -> 3.0r1 Update CD
>
> then we are most happy to supply this disc to our Debian customers.
That would be a useful thing. I know that I would also like to hav
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Greg Madden wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 January 2003 02:54 pm, Marcel Kunath wrote:
> > Since Debian has blown up in size so much the chance is unfortunately nil.
> > We looked at creating a Debian 3.0r1 Update CD (with some automation
> > inside) but even this task is problemati
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 02:54 pm, Marcel Kunath wrote:
> Since Debian has blown up in size so much the chance is unfortunately nil.
> We looked at creating a Debian 3.0r1 Update CD (with some automation
> inside) but even this task is problematic because this business is less
> familiar with t
Marcel Kunath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-09 10:54:05 +1100]:
>
> If a Debian guru can come up with a way to create a
>
> Debian 3.0r0 -> 3.0r1 Update CD
>
> then we are most happy to supply this disc to our Debian customers.
That would be a useful thing. I know that I would also like to hav
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Greg Madden wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 January 2003 02:54 pm, Marcel Kunath wrote:
> > Since Debian has blown up in size so much the chance is unfortunately nil.
> > We looked at creating a Debian 3.0r1 Update CD (with some automation
> > inside) but even this task is problemati
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 02:54 pm, Marcel Kunath wrote:
> Since Debian has blown up in size so much the chance is unfortunately nil.
> We looked at creating a Debian 3.0r1 Update CD (with some automation
> inside) but even this task is problematic because this business is less
> familiar with t
Since Debian has blown up in size so much the chance is unfortunately nil. We
looked at creating a Debian 3.0r1 Update CD (with some automation inside) but
even this task is problematic because this business is less familiar with the
Debian architecture.
We were looking for a real simple effic
Since Debian has blown up in size so much the chance is unfortunately nil. We looked
at creating a Debian 3.0r1 Update CD (with some automation inside) but even this task
is problematic because this business is less familiar with the Debian architecture.
We were looking for a real simple effici
16 matches
Mail list logo
