On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:48:07PM +0800, Matt Kemner wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, quoth Steve McIntyre:
Hmmm. Smoother, maybe. I just made a mistake copying the update files
into place and overwrote the original MD5SUMS files for most of the
architectures. Bugger. As I (obviously) can't
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:48:07PM +0800, Matt Kemner wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, quoth Steve McIntyre:
Hmmm. Smoother, maybe. I just made a mistake copying the update files
into place and overwrote the original MD5SUMS files for most of the
architectures. Bugger. As I (obviously) can't
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:17, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:50:35PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
On the whole, this could have gone smoother than it did, and would
probably have gone much better if I'd just left it to Steve, who we
have to thank for producing the vast majority of
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, bob parker wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:17, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:50:35PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
On the whole, this could have gone smoother than it did, and would
probably have gone much better if I'd just left it to Steve, who we
have
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 04:54, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, bob parker wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:17, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:50:35PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
On the whole, this could have gone smoother than it did, and would
probably have gone
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, quoth Steve McIntyre:
Hmmm. Smoother, maybe. I just made a mistake copying the update files
into place and overwrote the original MD5SUMS files for most of the
architectures. Bugger. As I (obviously) can't recreate them with
Phil's key, I've regenerated replacements that
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:17, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:50:35PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
On the whole, this could have gone smoother than it did, and would
probably have gone much better if I'd just left it to Steve, who we
have to thank for producing the vast majority of
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, bob parker wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:17, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:50:35PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
On the whole, this could have gone smoother than it did, and would
probably have gone much better if I'd just left it to Steve, who we
have
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 04:54, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, bob parker wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:17, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:50:35PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
On the whole, this could have gone smoother than it did, and would
probably have gone
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, quoth Steve McIntyre:
Hmmm. Smoother, maybe. I just made a mistake copying the update files
into place and overwrote the original MD5SUMS files for most of the
architectures. Bugger. As I (obviously) can't recreate them with
Phil's key, I've regenerated replacements that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
Sorry about this, but for several of the architectures the images I had
made ended up being larger than 650MB. Since Steve independently
managed to produce images that were actually small enough to fit on a
650MB CD, I've decided to go
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:50:35PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
On the whole, this could have gone smoother than it did, and would
probably have gone much better if I'd just left it to Steve, who we
have to thank for producing the vast majority of the images that we're
actually using for 3.0_r2 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
Sorry about this, but for several of the architectures the images I had
made ended up being larger than 650MB. Since Steve independently
managed to produce images that were actually small enough to fit on a
650MB CD, I've decided to go
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:50:35PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
On the whole, this could have gone smoother than it did, and would
probably have gone much better if I'd just left it to Steve, who we
have to thank for producing the vast majority of the images that we're
actually using for 3.0_r2 ---
14 matches
Mail list logo
