Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:30:06PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:02:40PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:35:57AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: OK, found it. Local bug in how update-cd and md5sum were communicating. Now fixed, and I'm building new images and jigdos now. They'll be available later today, I hope. I have new images and jigdos ready to go. To avoid confusion between the first set and these, I want to name them something different. Suggestions? I'm thinking of debian-30r2.01-update-* atm... No better suggestions; I'll go with these now, and a README to explain the name in the 3.0_r2 directory. I've checked the new images, jigdos and templates, and they seem fine now. They're in place on non-us.cdimage.debian.org, along with the README and a Packages.tar.gz which contains the missing Packages files in case people want to try and fix/work around the broken initial set of images. Do you want me to update this on cdimage.debian.org and mirrors? And where is the README? /Mattias Wadenstein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:07:47PM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote: I've checked the new images, jigdos and templates, and they seem fine now. They're in place on non-us.cdimage.debian.org, along with the README and a Packages.tar.gz which contains the missing Packages files in case people want to try and fix/work around the broken initial set of images. Do you want me to update this on cdimage.debian.org and mirrors? And where is the README? Please, yes. The new versions are on open in the usual place, along with the README and the Packages.tar.gz file I mentioned: Ah, it is just not listed in the http filelisting. And the stuff in the debian-jigdo rsync module seems to be older: drwxr-xr-x4096 2003/12/05 18:18:36 alpha I don't have access to open either. OK. Phil should be back shortly, and has access to both. It'll probably be easiest to ask him to sync them up. Thanks anyway... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane... pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:30:06PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:02:40PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:35:57AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: OK, found it. Local bug in how update-cd and md5sum were communicating. Now fixed, and I'm building new images and jigdos now. They'll be available later today, I hope. I have new images and jigdos ready to go. To avoid confusion between the first set and these, I want to name them something different. Suggestions? I'm thinking of debian-30r2.01-update-* atm... No better suggestions; I'll go with these now, and a README to explain the name in the 3.0_r2 directory. I've checked the new images, jigdos and templates, and they seem fine now. They're in place on non-us.cdimage.debian.org, along with the README and a Packages.tar.gz which contains the missing Packages files in case people want to try and fix/work around the broken initial set of images. Do you want me to update this on cdimage.debian.org and mirrors? And where is the README? /Mattias Wadenstein
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote: I've checked the new images, jigdos and templates, and they seem fine now. They're in place on non-us.cdimage.debian.org, along with the README and a Packages.tar.gz which contains the missing Packages files in case people want to try and fix/work around the broken initial set of images. Do you want me to update this on cdimage.debian.org and mirrors? And where is the README? Please, yes. The new versions are on open in the usual place, along with the README and the Packages.tar.gz file I mentioned: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jigdo-area/3.0_r2/jigdo$ ls -al total 1728 drwxr-xr-x 14 phil phil 4096 Dec 10 00:32 . drwxr-xr-x4 phil phil 4096 Nov 27 00:13 .. -rw-r--r--1 stevem stevem286 Dec 10 00:16 MD5SUMS-UPDATE -rw-r--r--1 stevem stevem1698700 Dec 10 00:15 Packages.tar.gz -rw-r--r--1 stevem stevem 1149 Dec 10 00:17 README.update drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 alpha drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 arm drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 hppa drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 i386 drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 ia64 drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 m68k drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 mips drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 mipsel drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 powerpc drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 s390 drwxr-sr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 source drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 sparc -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/ pgp8HJifYnWTy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:07:47PM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote: I've checked the new images, jigdos and templates, and they seem fine now. They're in place on non-us.cdimage.debian.org, along with the README and a Packages.tar.gz which contains the missing Packages files in case people want to try and fix/work around the broken initial set of images. Do you want me to update this on cdimage.debian.org and mirrors? And where is the README? Please, yes. The new versions are on open in the usual place, along with the README and the Packages.tar.gz file I mentioned: Ah, it is just not listed in the http filelisting. And the stuff in the debian-jigdo rsync module seems to be older: drwxr-xr-x4096 2003/12/05 18:18:36 alpha I don't have access to open either. OK. Phil should be back shortly, and has access to both. It'll probably be easiest to ask him to sync them up. Thanks anyway... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane... pgpvr0Uod0ISg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve McIntyre wrote: I've checked the new images, jigdos and templates, and they seem fine now. They're in place on non-us.cdimage.debian.org, along with the README and a Packages.tar.gz which contains the missing Packages files in case people want to try and fix/work around the broken initial set of images. Do you want me to update this on cdimage.debian.org and mirrors? And where is the README? Please, yes. The new versions are on open in the usual place, along with the README and the Packages.tar.gz file I mentioned: Ah, it is just not listed in the http filelisting. And the stuff in the debian-jigdo rsync module seems to be older: drwxr-xr-x4096 2003/12/05 18:18:36 alpha I don't have access to open either. /Mattias Wadenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jigdo-area/3.0_r2/jigdo$ ls -al total 1728 drwxr-xr-x 14 phil phil 4096 Dec 10 00:32 . drwxr-xr-x4 phil phil 4096 Nov 27 00:13 .. -rw-r--r--1 stevem stevem286 Dec 10 00:16 MD5SUMS-UPDATE -rw-r--r--1 stevem stevem1698700 Dec 10 00:15 Packages.tar.gz -rw-r--r--1 stevem stevem 1149 Dec 10 00:17 README.update drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 alpha drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 arm drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 hppa drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 i386 drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 ia64 drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 m68k drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 mips drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 mipsel drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 powerpc drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 s390 drwxr-sr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 source drwxr-xr-x2 stevem stevem 4096 Dec 10 00:30 sparc
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 06:15:24AM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote: MoiN I downloaded the debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso with jigdo from non-us.cdimage.d.o and noticed that all package files in dists/ are zero-sized. You need to regenerate this image to be useful with apt-get. The md5sum of the broken debian update iso is 3651b17f5b1cc389e6414e311b31edff debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso but you probably should check !i386, too. The sources iso seems ok, though. You can check without rootaccess by using isoinfo (packet mkisofs, source cdrtools): isoinfo -lR -i debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso I also downloaded the debian-update-3.0r2-src.iso which looks correct. I did not download the update cd for other arches so I couldn't check. They semm not too good tistributed, at least no mirror in .de has them. Bollocks, yes. You're right. I'm checking through my copies now to see what went wrong with the Packages files, which are empty for all architectures. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] There's no sensation to compare with this Suspended animation, A state of bliss pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:35:57AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: OK, found it. Local bug in how update-cd and md5sum were communicating. Now fixed, and I'm building new images and jigdos now. They'll be available later today, I hope. I have new images and jigdos ready to go. To avoid confusion between the first set and these, I want to name them something different. Suggestions? I'm thinking of debian-30r2.01-update-* atm... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] I've only once written 'SQL is my bitch' in a comment. But that code is in use on a military site... -- Simon Booth pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 06:15:24AM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote: MoiN I downloaded the debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso with jigdo from non-us.cdimage.d.o and noticed that all package files in dists/ are zero-sized. You need to regenerate this image to be useful with apt-get. The md5sum of the broken debian update iso is 3651b17f5b1cc389e6414e311b31edff debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso but you probably should check !i386, too. The sources iso seems ok, though. You can check without rootaccess by using isoinfo (packet mkisofs, source cdrtools): isoinfo -lR -i debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso I also downloaded the debian-update-3.0r2-src.iso which looks correct. I did not download the update cd for other arches so I couldn't check. They semm not too good tistributed, at least no mirror in .de has them. Bollocks, yes. You're right. I'm checking through my copies now to see what went wrong with the Packages files, which are empty for all architectures. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] There's no sensation to compare with this Suspended animation, A state of bliss pgpirKALf7sgA.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:46:37AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: I also downloaded the debian-update-3.0r2-src.iso which looks correct. I did not download the update cd for other arches so I couldn't check. They semm not too good tistributed, at least no mirror in .de has them. Bollocks, yes. You're right. I'm checking through my copies now to see what went wrong with the Packages files, which are empty for all architectures. OK, found it. Local bug in how update-cd and md5sum were communicating. Now fixed, and I'm building new images and jigdos now. They'll be available later today, I hope. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] We don't need no education. We don't need no thought control. pgpQKBAIamA3o.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:35:57AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: OK, found it. Local bug in how update-cd and md5sum were communicating. Now fixed, and I'm building new images and jigdos now. They'll be available later today, I hope. I have new images and jigdos ready to go. To avoid confusion between the first set and these, I want to name them something different. Suggestions? I'm thinking of debian-30r2.01-update-* atm... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] I've only once written 'SQL is my bitch' in a comment. But that code is in use on a military site... -- Simon Booth pgph8JjPLvL2p.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:02:40PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:35:57AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: OK, found it. Local bug in how update-cd and md5sum were communicating. Now fixed, and I'm building new images and jigdos now. They'll be available later today, I hope. I have new images and jigdos ready to go. To avoid confusion between the first set and these, I want to name them something different. Suggestions? I'm thinking of debian-30r2.01-update-* atm... No better suggestions; I'll go with these now, and a README to explain the name in the 3.0_r2 directory. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] We don't need no education. We don't need no thought control. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:30:06PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:02:40PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:35:57AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: OK, found it. Local bug in how update-cd and md5sum were communicating. Now fixed, and I'm building new images and jigdos now. They'll be available later today, I hope. I have new images and jigdos ready to go. To avoid confusion between the first set and these, I want to name them something different. Suggestions? I'm thinking of debian-30r2.01-update-* atm... No better suggestions; I'll go with these now, and a README to explain the name in the 3.0_r2 directory. I've checked the new images, jigdos and templates, and they seem fine now. They're in place on non-us.cdimage.debian.org, along with the README and a Packages.tar.gz which contains the missing Packages files in case people want to try and fix/work around the broken initial set of images. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Welcome my son, welcome to the machine. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
MoiN
I downloaded the debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso with jigdo from
non-us.cdimage.d.o and noticed that all package files in dists/ are
zero-sized. You need to regenerate this image to be useful with apt-get.
The md5sum of the broken debian update iso is
3651b17f5b1cc389e6414e311b31edff debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso
but you probably should check !i386, too. The sources iso seems ok,
though.
You can check without rootaccess by using isoinfo (packet mkisofs, source
cdrtools):
isoinfo -lR -i debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso
I also downloaded the debian-update-3.0r2-src.iso which looks correct. I
did not download the update cd for other arches so I couldn't check.
They semm not too good tistributed, at least no mirror in .de has them.
Ingo
--
set echo on
set [EMAIL PROTECTED] $1 %03d `$1 -e '43781*57271-2\n3*(32900411657-1)'|bc`
$2 $5.$(printf $3 $($2 -n $5 {,++}{+,++} p|od -tc -w27|dc))|tr $4 $1
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
3.0_r2 update CDs broken?
MoiN
I downloaded the debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso with jigdo from
non-us.cdimage.d.o and noticed that all package files in dists/ are
zero-sized. You need to regenerate this image to be useful with apt-get.
The md5sum of the broken debian update iso is
3651b17f5b1cc389e6414e311b31edff debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso
but you probably should check !i386, too. The sources iso seems ok,
though.
You can check without rootaccess by using isoinfo (packet mkisofs, source
cdrtools):
isoinfo -lR -i debian-update-3.0r2-i386.iso
I also downloaded the debian-update-3.0r2-src.iso which looks correct. I
did not download the update cd for other arches so I couldn't check.
They semm not too good tistributed, at least no mirror in .de has them.
Ingo
--
set echo on
set [EMAIL PROTECTED] $1 %03d `$1 -e '43781*57271-2\n3*(32900411657-1)'|bc`
$2 $5.$(printf $3 $($2 -n $5 {,++}{+,++} p|od -tc -w27|dc))|tr $4 $1
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
