Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 10:53:09AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 00:51 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > > >[sorry for the delay in replying] > > > > > >On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of > > >> these > > >> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > > > > >It's worked before. > > > > > >> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > > > > > >Definitely now too soon, and didn't really work for me anyway. > > > > > >> 15/16 July > > >> 22/23 July > > >> > > >> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] > > > > > >One of those should work for me. Working out which is currently blocking > > >on other people. :| > > > > Can we get a decision please? Summer weekends are busy... > > Yes, sorry. :-( So are Summer weekdays it would appear. > > Based on the other responses received, it looks like the only logical > answer is the 22nd, closing {o,}pu-new next weekend. Yes; let's make it that unless there are any objections. Thanks. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 00:51 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > >[sorry for the delay in replying] > > > >On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > >> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > > >It's worked before. > > > >> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > > > >Definitely now too soon, and didn't really work for me anyway. > > > >> 15/16 July > >> 22/23 July > >> > >> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] > > > >One of those should work for me. Working out which is currently blocking > >on other people. :| > > Can we get a decision please? Summer weekends are busy... Yes, sorry. :-( So are Summer weekdays it would appear. Based on the other responses received, it looks like the only logical answer is the 22nd, closing {o,}pu-new next weekend. Regards, Adam
Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >[sorry for the delay in replying] > >On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> Hi, >> >> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these >> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > >It's worked before. > >> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > >Definitely now too soon, and didn't really work for me anyway. > >> 15/16 July >> 22/23 July >> >> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] > >One of those should work for me. Working out which is currently blocking >on other people. :| Can we get a decision please? Summer weekends are busy... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowden
Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
On 04/07/17 16:34, Charles Chambers wrote: > Might a lowly user propose taking an extra month so that more of the bugs > installing 9.0 can be worked out? > > It is summer, after all. There will be a 9.2 release. Whatever doesn't get included in 9.1 can be fixed in 9.2. If we applied that argument, we'd never do a point release. Emilio
Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
Might a lowly user propose taking an extra month so that more of the bugs installing 9.0 can be worked out? It is summer, after all. On Jun 25, 2017 12:10 PM, "Jonathan Wiltshire" wrote: > Hi, > > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July > 22/23 July > > [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] > > Thanks, > > -- > Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org > Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw > > 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 > >
Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:10:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July > 22/23 July > > [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] Hi! Please, choose the date that suits you better and we'll manage to have somebody around from the pressblicity team :) Ana
Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
[sorry for the delay in replying] On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? It's worked before. > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) Definitely now too soon, and didn't really work for me anyway. > 15/16 July > 22/23 July > > [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] One of those should work for me. Working out which is currently blocking on other people. :| Cheers, Adam
Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
On 14714 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July Both of them don't work for me. > 22/23 July That I could do. -- bye, Joerg
Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
Hi, Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-06-25): > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of > these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July > 22/23 July I should be equally busy on all weeks leading to these week-ends, so no preferences from me. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:10:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Hi, > >A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these >suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > >8/9 July (probably a bit soon) Impossible for me, I'm busy all weekend. >15/16 July >22/23 July Both look fine for me. I'm happy to do 8.9 on the same weekend, but media will take a short while to come out after 9.1. The first point release always throws up surprises IME... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowden
Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
Hi, A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) 15/16 July 22/23 July [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51