On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:41:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:48:49PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 03:41:14PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >after having looked at
>> > https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/bt-dv
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:48:49PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 03:41:14PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >after having looked at
> > https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/bt-dvd/
> >i wonder whether the .torrent files are sufficently signed on the
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 03:41:14PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>after having looked at
> https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/bt-dvd/
>i wonder whether the .torrent files are sufficently signed on their own.
>At least they are not listed in the *SUMS files.
>
>Is this a simil
Hi,
after having looked at
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/bt-dvd/
i wonder whether the .torrent files are sufficently signed on their own.
At least they are not listed in the *SUMS files.
Is this a similar security problem as with the .jigdo files ?
(I have no clue of BitTo
4 matches
Mail list logo