Re: Scheduling 9.2

[Jonathan Wiltshire]

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 02:35:32PM +0800, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Le 18 septembre 2017 00:25:55 GMT+08:00, "Adam D. Barratt" 
>  a écrit :
> 
> >
> >That currently looks okay for me too.
> >
> >If we're going for that weekend then it would be good to be able to
> >announce as soon as feasible, as it would mean freezing p-u in two
> >weekends time.
> >
> >I note that we're still missing at least an ftp-master response, and it
> >would be worth confirming that publicity are happy (as I'm not sure if
> >Laura's response only covers the initial suggested dates).
> >
> 
> I confirm that the publicity team is fine with the weekend of Oct. 7.

Ok, let's make it 7th. Thanks.



-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Re: Scheduling 9.2

[Cédric Boutillier]

Hi,

Le 18 septembre 2017 00:25:55 GMT+08:00, "Adam D. Barratt" 
 a écrit :

>
>That currently looks okay for me too.
>
>If we're going for that weekend then it would be good to be able to
>announce as soon as feasible, as it would mean freezing p-u in two
>weekends time.
>
>I note that we're still missing at least an ftp-master response, and it
>would be worth confirming that publicity are happy (as I'm not sure if
>Laura's response only covers the initial suggested dates).
>

I confirm that the publicity team is fine with the weekend of Oct. 7.

Best regards,

Cédric, for the publicity team

Re: Scheduling 9.2

[Ansgar Burchardt]

Jonathan Wiltshire writes:
> Ok, does 7th October work any better?  I'm keen not to get too far adrift
> from the interval though.

Should be okay if no other ftpmaster volunteers.

Ansgar

Re: Scheduling 9.2

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 15:31 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:31:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:48:14PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two month cycle we're aiming
> > > > for around
> > > > 23rd September. How about one of:
> > > > 
> > > > 23rd/24th September
> > > > 30th Septmber/1st October
> > > 
> > > I'm out in San Francisco for the week ib between them. I can't do
> > > the
> > > first weekend, but might be able to do the second while
> > > jetlagged. Another weekend would be preferred, though
> > 
> > Ok, does 7th October work any better?  I'm keen not to get too far
> > adrift
> > from the interval though.
> 
> Works fine for me, yep.

That currently looks okay for me too.

If we're going for that weekend then it would be good to be able to
announce as soon as feasible, as it would mean freezing p-u in two
weekends time.

I note that we're still missing at least an ftp-master response, and it
would be worth confirming that publicity are happy (as I'm not sure if
Laura's response only covers the initial suggested dates).

Regards,

Adam

Re: Scheduling 9.2

[Steve McIntyre]

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:31:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:48:14PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two month cycle we're aiming for around
>> >23rd September. How about one of:
>> >
>> >23rd/24th September
>> >30th Septmber/1st October
>> 
>> I'm out in San Francisco for the week ib between them. I can't do the
>> first weekend, but might be able to do the second while
>> jetlagged. Another weekend would be preferred, though
>
>Ok, does 7th October work any better?  I'm keen not to get too far adrift
>from the interval though.

Works fine for me, yep.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Is there anybody out there?

Re: Scheduling 9.2

[Jonathan Wiltshire]

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:31:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:48:14PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two month cycle we're aiming for around
> >23rd September. How about one of:
> >
> >23rd/24th September
> >30th Septmber/1st October
> 
> I'm out in San Francisco for the week ib between them. I can't do the
> first weekend, but might be able to do the second while
> jetlagged. Another weekend would be preferred, though


Ok, does 7th October work any better?  I'm keen not to get too far adrift
from the interval though.


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Re: Scheduling 9.2

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello

El 27/08/17 a las 17:48, Jonathan Wiltshire escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two month cycle we're aiming for around
> 23rd September. How about one of:
> 
> 23rd/24th September
> 30th Septmber/1st October
> 
> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ]
> 
> After discussion with Adam and Steve, we felt it made sense to work on 2
> months for stable and 4 months for oldstable; that way there isn't a month
> 3 to try and fit in betweens. So every other stable update will also be an
> oldstable.
> 
> Thanks,
> 

Please choose the date that suits better and at least one member of
publicity team will be around for the announcement.

Cheers
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: Scheduling 9.2

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Sun, 2017-08-27 at 16:48 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two month cycle we're aiming for
> around 23rd September. How about one of:
> 
> 23rd/24th September
> 30th Septmber/1st October
> 
> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ]

I'd prefer to avoid the 23rd/24th if we can (and I assume we will be
anyway, given Steve's response).

The second weekend looks like it should work for me, as currently do
any others during October.

Adam

Re: Scheduling 9.2

[Steve McIntyre]

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:48:14PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two month cycle we're aiming for around
>23rd September. How about one of:
>
>23rd/24th September
>30th Septmber/1st October

I'm out in San Francisco for the week ib between them. I can't do the
first weekend, but might be able to do the second while
jetlagged. Another weekend would be preferred, though

>After discussion with Adam and Steve, we felt it made sense to work on 2
>months for stable and 4 months for oldstable; that way there isn't a month
>3 to try and fit in betweens. So every other stable update will also be an
>oldstable.

WFM.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Who needs computer imagery when you've got Brian Blessed?