Re: bug 887830 and 887831

2018-02-16 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i wrote: > > jigdo-lite could now make automatic use of the *SUMS via the according > > *sum programs. Steve McIntyre wrote: > That's a change I don't really want to make - the *SUMS we have are > specific to the Debian layout, and AFAIK we're not the only people > using jigdo. It would

Re: bug 887830, was: Joliet name length in amd64 netinst versus DVD-2

2018-02-16 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 05:29:45PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > >Now the next weakest point in Jigdo download is > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887831 > "jigdo-file: Jigdo .template file and resulting ISO are only verified by MD5" > >jigdo-lite after fix of bug 865864

Re: bug 887830

2018-02-12 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887831 > "jigdo-file: Jigdo .template file and resulting ISO are only verified > by MD5" > [...] > jigdo-lite could now make automatic use of the *SUMS via the according > *sum programs. It comes to me that jigdo-lite would first

Re: bug 887830, was: Joliet name length in amd64 netinst versus DVD-2

2018-02-12 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i wrote: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887830 > > "debian-cd: *.jigdo files should be listed in the *SUMS files" Steve McIntyre: > ACK, it's a fairly simple fix to the debian-cd setup. I've pushed the > changes and if you check today's daily/weekly builds you'll see