On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 07:33:13PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > Short of communicating with a remote service, I'm not sure how we can
> > get more meaningful functional test coverage in this package, but it
> > would be nice to do so.
>
> There is also another "Restrictions: needs-internet"
Hi Noah, all,
On 08-09-2020 20:33, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:48 PM Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:38:18AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> The test done in the autopkgtest of 'awscli' does not provide
>>> significant test coverage and it should be
Hi Noah,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:48 PM Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:38:18AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > The test done in the autopkgtest of 'awscli' does not provide
> > significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
> > superficial".
>
> The
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:38:18AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> The test done in the autopkgtest of 'awscli' does not provide
> significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
> superficial".
The current test merely invokes "/usr/bin/aws help". Is there any
actual value
Source: awscli
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'awscli' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref:
