I am also very interested in this topic.
I currently in need of building a bare minimum image for AWS. My current approach is to use FAI
inside of Packer script.
- Packer prepares the build machine (dependencies, tools, etc.)
- FAI builds the disk image
- I clone the image to EBS volume and
Hello Debian-Cloud !
I've noticed that Debian images in the AWS boot into runlevel 5 by default,
which is incorrect (it
should be 3) and might potentially lead to issues with some services.
root@ip-172-19-1-122:~# ec2metadata --ami-id
ami-fa0bb29e
root@ip-172-19-1-122:~# runlevel
N 5
On 04/11/16 12:19 PM, James Bromberger wrote:
> On 4/11/2016 10:28 PM, Tim Sattarov wrote:
>> Just checked on one of the instances:
>> dmidecode shows
>>
>> BIOS Information
>> Vendor: Xen
>> Version: 4.2.amazon
>>
On 04/11/16 10:12 AM, Tim Sattarov wrote:
> On 04/11/16 01:26 AM, James Bromberger wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Some of you may recall a 30 second delay for xen_fb_frontend when
>> booting Debian in EC2[1]. It appears that this is now starting to
>> resol
On 23/09/16 12:59 PM, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
>
> I think you're over complicating this, have a look in here (for bootstaping)
> https://bootstrap-vz.readthedocs.io/en/master/manifests/index.html#bootstrapper
> and here (for mirror you want to use within your image)
>
Hello,
I'm stuck with a couple of tasks related to EC2 image building with
bootstrap-vz:
1) What would be the best way configuring default mirrors for apt ?
I see that sources.list is generated by cloud-init, which has
httpdredir.debian.org, I want to change it to cloudfront.debian.net.
So far I
Hi James,
I was trying to create my own images using bootstrap-vz, what did you
use to create these ?
I'm interested in version of bootstrap-vz and manifest.
Thanks !
On 22/09/16 10:26 AM, James Bromberger wrote:
>
> Let's try this for the nth time and see if it gets through to the list! ;)
>
>
On 28/07/16 12:37 PM, James Bromberger wrote:
> On 28/07/2016 10:47 PM, Tim Sattarov wrote:
>
>> Just a side note, if we plan to use HTTPS, Cloudfront supports only
>> single certificate per distribution.
>>
> But that single cert may be with SAN.
This is something
On 28/07/16 03:45 AM, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
>
> I'd vote for cdn-aws.deb.debian.org and additional cnames like cloudfront.d.o.
>
>
Just a side note, if we plan to use HTTPS, Cloudfront supports only
single certificate per distribution.
On 22/07/16 10:18 AM, James Bromberger wrote:
>
> Tim,
> It's origin is ftp.debian.org. See more details in here:
> http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2013/debconf13/high/1036_AWS_Debian.ogv
>
> Let me know if there is a better upstream to have as an origin -
> preferably one
On 21/07/16 01:21 PM, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
>
>>
>> Do we know what is the origin for cloudfront.debian.net ?
> Yes, we do just check http://cloudfront.debian.net it's documented there. If
> you want to know more specific details probably I can post them later on.
There is nothing on origin used
On 21/07/16 10:07 AM, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> On 2016-07-21 20:27:53, James Bromberger wrote:
>> On 21/07/2016 3:58 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>
>>> 09:25 <@Mithrandir> lucas: it's not suitable for deb.d.o in its current
>>> configuration.
>>> 09:25 <@Mithrandir> as I said whenever somebody last
On 04/05/16 01:24 PM, Daniel Stender wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wanted to drop the note that Packer is now available as Debian package:
> https://packages.debian.org/unstable/packer
Just recently discovered that. Thanks !
How hard will it be to do the same with terraform ?
I can help !
Tim
> Thanks,
> DS
>
Thanks Tiago
On 09/02/16 06:23 PM, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> Only noticed now, but this is a known Xen bug[1] and was already
> mentioned here[2]. James Bromberger suggested exactly this
> approach[3], which seems to be adopted by CoreOS with success[4][5].
Yes, I've got my understanding of this
On 09/02/16 01:12 PM, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I was hit by that yesterday:
Glad I'm not alone with this
> Ubuntu used to have an EC2 flavor of their kernel, but looks like they
> aren't using it anymore since Maverick (10.10)[1]. So I'm not sure if
> we should do this nearly six years
On 09/02/16 12:29 PM, Tim Sattarov wrote:
> I will open bug for bootstrap-vz to include that fix or may be there is
> better way to fix it.
>
Heh, I've just noticed this:
https://github.com/andsens/bootstrap-vz/releases/tag/v0.9.9-squeeze
So I guess first question can be closed ? :)
16 matches
Mail list logo
