On 25/07/16 at 16:32 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/20/2016 12:03 PM, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> > I don't mind if there is a task/metapkg called "EC2-optimal",
> > "OpenStack-Optimized", whatever. but the default image on each cloud
> > provider should be as close as possible to debian i
what does the user experience look like for me as an image creator.
Compare it to running debootstrap, vmdebootstrap or bootstrap-vz.
I'm honestly curious. I would have thought making an image with d-i
would have been rather heavy-weight and unweildy to run. I'd never
given it serious thought, bu
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:59:18 +0200, Thomas Goirand
> > said:
>
> > Using things like tasksel or d-i to generate a cloud image is really
> > overengineering everything.
Le Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Thomas Lange a écrit :
>
> I would never use d-i or tasksel for creating
In fact, I think there was a consensus in the room in Cape Town that we
very much did not want something as close to what d-i produces, but
instead wanted something that was minimal.
--Sam
On 07/20/2016 12:54 PM, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> So in total we fixed something on users request and nobody complained about
> it,
Lucas + me: that's 2 complains.
> win-win for me.
On 07/20/2016 12:39 PM, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> Example setting up swappiness to 0 is reasonable as there is no swap
On 07/20/2016 08:59 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> - there's a number of sysctl changes in /etc/sysctl.d/01_ec2.conf:
> vm.swappiness = 0
> vm.dirty_ratio = 80
> vm.dirty_background_ratio = 5
> vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 12000
> net.core.somaxconn = 1000
> net.core.netdev_max_
On 07/20/2016 08:59 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> - dkms, which also pulls linux-headers-amd64, gcc 4.8 and 4.9, make,
> patch, sudo: Apparently, this is required to build Intel's ixgbevf
> driver, which is built and shipped inside the image. The 'task' in
> bootstrapvz doesn't explain in which
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:59:18 +0200, Thomas Goirand said:
> On 07/20/2016 11:26 AM, Thomas Lange wrote:
>> Using tasksel we already have different flavours of Debian
>> installations. Why not see the cloud images as another flavour, which
>> besides having some additional pac
On 07/20/2016 11:26 AM, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Using tasksel we already have different flavours of Debian
> installations. Why not see the cloud images as another flavour, which
> besides having some additional packages installed also tune some
> parameters for best practice in a cloud environment.
