On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:14:15PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Could you guys read the patch, at:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868875#33
>
> Do you think it should be merged ASAP, and then ask for cloud-utils to
> be unblocked?
>
> Release is coming, we'd better fix
Dear Debian cloud team,
Could you guys read the patch, at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868875#33
Do you think it should be merged ASAP, and then ask for cloud-utils to
be unblocked?
Release is coming, we'd better fix this quickly if we need to, and I
don't feel like doing
On 4/28/21 7:00 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2021-04-28 09:45:38 -0700 (-0700), Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> [...]
>> I suspect, but am not sure, that even in OpenStack environments, it's
>> the administrator that is going to be retrieving the images and
>> registering them with the service, and most
On 4/28/21 9:53 AM, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created a proposal for updating the header seen in
> https://cloud.debian.org/cdimage/cloud/
>
> You can see it here
> https://public.cs.uni-koeln.de/lange/images-cloud-HEADER.html
>
> Any comments welcome.
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for this.
Is
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:56:55 +0200, Bastian Blank said:
> We don't readlly provide GCE images. Some might show up, but we don't
> want to advertise that.
We build images for GCE, we call them debian-11-gce-amd64-daily-... so
we can say we provide images for GCE.
> Maybe "All
Hi Thomas
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 09:53:02AM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote:
> I've created a proposal for updating the header seen in
> https://cloud.debian.org/cdimage/cloud/
> You can see it here
> https://public.cs.uni-koeln.de/lange/images-cloud-HEADER.html
> Any comments welcome.
We don't
On 2021-04-28 09:45:38 -0700 (-0700), Noah Meyerhans wrote:
[...]
> I suspect, but am not sure, that even in OpenStack environments, it's
> the administrator that is going to be retrieving the images and
> registering them with the service, and most users of those services
> aren't going to need
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 09:53:02AM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote:
> I've created a proposal for updating the header seen in
> https://cloud.debian.org/cdimage/cloud/
>
> You can see it here
> https://public.cs.uni-koeln.de/lange/images-cloud-HEADER.html
>
> Any comments welcome.
Definitely an
On 4/27/21 5:12 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This is really bad style, borderline abusive.
>
> [...]
>
> Maybe. But please note that my view is that no Debian resource, like
> the wiki, should point to your replicated stuff as long as there is a
> delegated team that does the work. And also
On 4/28/21 10:34 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> What was unfriedly? Do you think it would be appropriate for me to use
> my access to fasolo (aka ftp-master) or, worse, seger (aka
> security-master) as ftp team member to setup my own separate archive
> mirror stuff (including NEW), just because I
Hi
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 09:38:31AM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:38:57 -0700, Ross Vandegrift
> > said:
> > I think you're probably right on this. Since the cloud team is
> delegated, zigo
> > would need to remain a cloud team member to continue
Hi,
I've created a proposal for updating the header seen in
https://cloud.debian.org/cdimage/cloud/
You can see it here
https://public.cs.uni-koeln.de/lange/images-cloud-HEADER.html
Any comments welcome.
--
viele Grüße Thomas
Hi Thomas,
(I've started writing this mail yesterday, before I received all the
replies to your mail)
I can understand your frustation. I'm also not happy about how some
thing happen in the cloud team. I share your concerns about the
over-engineered tool written in python. During our first
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:38:57 -0700, Ross Vandegrift
> said:
> I think you're probably right on this. Since the cloud team is
delegated, zigo
> would need to remain a cloud team member to continue publishing official
> images. I hadn't considered that in my other mail,
14 matches
Mail list logo