On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:05:01PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 08:01:55AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > For ci, we are working with the security team on testing embargoed
> > security updates, and for that we need a unique IP address, because it
> > will be
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 09:12, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> However, based on the responses, it is evident that this change will
> cause sufficient problems for enough people that we should reconsider
> its timing. To be clear, there is absolutely no pressure from AWS or
> any other entity to reduce
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 07:45:31AM -0800, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> > We like to do a global change to the way the network is setup on the new
> > AWS accounts. The goal is to reduce the amount of global IPv4 addresses
> > to a minimum, as those are an increasingly rare comodity nowadays.
>
>
Hi Bastian,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:16:38PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> We like to do a global change to the way the network is setup on the new
> AWS accounts. The goal is to reduce the amount of global IPv4 addresses
> to a minimum, as those are an increasingly rare comodity nowadays.
Hi
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 08:01:55AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> For ci, we are working with the security team on testing embargoed
> security updates, and for that we need a unique IP address, because it
> will be added to an ACL on the security repository side.
You mean via
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:16:38PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> We like to do a global change to the way the network is setup on the new
> AWS accounts. The goal is to reduce the amount of global IPv4 addresses
> to a minimum, as those are an increasingly rare comodity nowadays.
>
On 17/11/21 at 10:30 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:31:12PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I'm surprised by this: what is the motivation? Have we been asked to use
> > less IPv4 addresses?
>
> Yes, you get at most two. We can also remove the NAT one, as access
Hi
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:31:12PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm surprised by this: what is the motivation? Have we been asked to use
> less IPv4 addresses?
Yes, you get at most two. We can also remove the NAT one, as access to
Debian's infrastructure is capable of working IPv6-only,
