> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:34:07 -0700, Noah Meyerhans said:
> delegates than is ideal? For their official duties, I'm not sure that
> the workload is going to increase materially if we operate with only two
> people, but I could be wrong. Would the current delegates like to
>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 01:34:07PM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> For their official duties, I'm not sure that the workload is going to
> increase materially if we operate with only two people, but I could be wrong.
> Would the current delegates like to comment?
The official workload is small.
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 11:16:10AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I very much prefer a conversation along the line of "we have no choice,
> there's nobody else" rather than denying any possible conflict of
> interest. Even more, if we were to say: let's break the rule
> temporarily, until we have
On 6/4/20 7:51 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> I'm conerned that we won't find another delegate. IIRC there were only three
> eligible Debian members at the most recent sprint, and one has left the team.
> So I'd like to consider other ways to protect ourselves, while opening the
> delegation up to
Hi all,
I am not active anymore, but I have been witnessing the
professionalisation of Debian's cloud activities...
Speaking with my experience of Policy delegate, one problem with formal
delegation is what to do when a large proportion of the delegates is
barely active. With volunteers it is
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 10:51:02PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 11:22:26PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> > I would like there never to be a situtation where one person or consultancy
> > controls Debian's presence on a platform, even if that person is
On 4 June 2020 05:04:19 BST, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 11:22:26PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
>> > > We're afraid of conflict of interest. There's been multiple times
>where
>> > > we saw it could happen, and by having the delegates not involved
>with a
>> > > provider,
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:41:40AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> It's been tempting on nearly every meeting that the team bypasses the
> Debian policy, and customizes the images with software backported from
> testing, and still call that Debian stable. It took a lot of explanation
> from Steve
Hi Luca,
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 11:22:26PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> I would like there never to be a situtation where one person or consultancy
> controls Debian's presence on a platform, even if that person is employed by
> the owner of said platform.
I think I agree, but want to make
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 11:22:26PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> > > We're afraid of conflict of interest. There's been multiple times where
> > > we saw it could happen, and by having the delegates not involved with a
> > > provider, we're hoping to reduce that risk.
> >
> > Can you cite a
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:41:40AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> We're afraid of conflict of interest. There's been multiple times where
> >> we saw it could happen, and by having the delegates not involved with a
> >> provider, we're hoping to reduce that risk.
> >
> > Can you cite a
On 6/4/20 12:54 AM, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 12:42:47AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> IMHO, this requirement makes more difficult to find as someone from the
>>> people, as AFAIK many of us are working in a way for a cloud provider,
>>> or a partner.
>>>
>>> What are we
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:54:18PM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 12:42:47AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > IMHO, this requirement makes more difficult to find as someone from the
> > > people, as AFAIK many of us are working in a way for a cloud provider,
> > > or a
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 12:42:47AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > IMHO, this requirement makes more difficult to find as someone from the
> > people, as AFAIK many of us are working in a way for a cloud provider,
> > or a partner.
> >
> > What are we actually afraid of here ? As far as the
On 6/3/20 11:38 PM, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
> Le 03/06/2020 à 10:50, Bastian Blank a écrit :
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 10:40:05AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>>> We might need to explain this to Jonathan: Two or three years back the
>>> Debian Cloud team agreed on an internal policy
Le 03/06/2020 à 10:50, Bastian Blank a écrit :
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 10:40:05AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> We might need to explain this to Jonathan: Two or three years back the
>> Debian Cloud team agreed on an internal policy during a face-to-face in
>> Seattle that
Hi
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 10:40:05AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> We might need to explain this to Jonathan: Two or three years back the
> Debian Cloud team agreed on an internal policy during a face-to-face in
> Seattle that delegates should neither be employees of the cloud
> providers
Hi Jonathan, hi Ross,
On Tue Jun 02, 2020 at 22:41:42 -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> > Dear Cloud Team
> >
> > Tomasz has resigned from the Cloud team, have you considered a
> > replacement for him in the team delegation?
> >
>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> Dear Cloud Team
>
> Tomasz has resigned from the Cloud team, have you considered a
> replacement for him in the team delegation?
>
> Do you need any assistance or help with re-staffing?
I have one idea for replacement, if the
Dear Cloud Team
Tomasz has resigned from the Cloud team, have you considered a
replacement for him in the team delegation?
Do you need any assistance or help with re-staffing?
Please let me know.
thanks,
-Jonathan, Debian Project Leader
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
20 matches
Mail list logo
