Re: locales vs. locales-all

2019-04-23 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 02:56:53PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Currently the legacy Azure and at least some of the OpenStack images > install locales-all. And actually all the other images don't install any of the locales packages. Regards, Bastian -- Our way is peace. --

Re: locales vs. locales-all

2019-01-29 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2019-01-28 08:46:44 -0800 (-0800), Ross Vandegrift wrote: [...] > This is what I'm used to, and the size seems like a compelling > reason to use locales over locales-all. But I'm not really clear > on the consequences. An example: on my workstation, and indeed on most/all of my personal

Re: locales vs. locales-all

2019-01-28 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 10:44:42AM -0800, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 02:56:53PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > While installing locales-all is pretty handy and avoids a lot of > > problems, I realized that is comes with a huge drawback: it makes the > > images a lot larger

Re: locales vs. locales-all

2019-01-28 Thread Vincent Caron
On Fri, 2019-01-25 at 14:56 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > While installing locales-all is pretty handy and avoids a lot of > problems, I realized that is comes with a huge drawback: it makes the > images a lot larger (230MB uncompressed and over 100MB compressed).  It > makes them so much larger

Re: locales vs. locales-all

2019-01-28 Thread Vincent Caron
On Sat, 2019-01-26 at 22:19 +0100, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: > Then if this case, maybe we could remove the AcceptEnv LANG LC_* from > sshd_config ? I systematically deactivate sshd's AcceptEnv because I like the principle of least-surprise, and locales are a big part of the surprising context and

Re: locales vs. locales-all

2019-01-26 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 1/25/19 2:56 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > > Currently the legacy Azure and at least some of the OpenStack images > install locales-all. > > While installing locales-all is pretty handy and avoids a lot of > problems, I realized that is comes with a huge drawback: it makes the >

Re: locales vs. locales-all

2019-01-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 26, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: > Then if this case, maybe we could remove the AcceptEnv LANG LC_* from > sshd_config ? Please don't: if this bothers you then fix it client side. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: locales vs. locales-all

2019-01-26 Thread Emmanuel Kasper
Le 25/01/2019 à 14:56, Bastian Blank a écrit : > Hi folks > > Currently the legacy Azure and at least some of the OpenStack images > install locales-all. > > While installing locales-all is pretty handy and avoids a lot of > problems, I realized that is comes with a huge drawback: it makes the >

Re: locales vs. locales-all

2019-01-26 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 02:56:53PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > While installing locales-all is pretty handy and avoids a lot of > problems, I realized that is comes with a huge drawback: it makes the > images a lot larger (230MB uncompressed and over 100MB compressed). It > makes them so much

Re: locales vs. locales-all

2019-01-26 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Fri Jan 25, 2019 at 14:56:53 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > > Currently the legacy Azure and at least some of the OpenStack images > install locales-all. > > While installing locales-all is pretty handy and avoids a lot of > problems, I realized that is comes with a huge

locales vs. locales-all

2019-01-25 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks Currently the legacy Azure and at least some of the OpenStack images install locales-all. While installing locales-all is pretty handy and avoids a lot of problems, I realized that is comes with a huge drawback: it makes the images a lot larger (230MB uncompressed and over 100MB