Hi folks
As mentioned during the last meeting, I would like to move the daily
builds out of the main debian-cloud-images project. The new project
reponsible for them would exist in a different group, so we don't longer
need to guard access to the main cloud-team group that strict.
Disadvantages
On 2019-09-01 14:17:21 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> I'm looking into our tooling in regards of python2 removal and
> noticed that https://github.com/eucalyptus/ looks basically dead I
> went through a few repos in there and it looks like most of them
> had last commits 2-3 years ago.
The
On 8/31/19 9:39 AM, Marcinn Kulisz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm planning to file RM for bootstrap-vz, it is still python2, upstream is
> dead
> and I do not plan to work on it at all.
>
> If somebody is interested in porting it to python3 and maintaining it feel
> free
> to adopt it and do all the
Hi Thomas
I don't see how your response relates to my original question. This is
the second time in a short while you decided to work this way.
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 04:21:23PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> If I understand well, you're moving ahead with having all done by the
> Salsa CI.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # please use the python3 version instead
> block 938545 by 935195 936229 936290 936371 936392 936592 936667 936745
> 937066 937069 937402 937543 937672 937747 937556 937587 937590 938059 938070
> 938116 938141 938232 938264 938433 938573 938629
Hi all,
I'm looking into our tooling in regards of python2 removal and noticed that
https://github.com/eucalyptus/ looks basically dead I went through a few repos
in there and it looks like most of them had last commits 2-3 years ago.
Are here any people who can claim to the contrary
On 9/1/19 12:40 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> As mentioned during the last meeting, I would like to move the daily
> builds out of the main debian-cloud-images project. The new project
> reponsible for them would exist in a different group, so we don't longer
> need to guard access to
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019, 10:51 Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi Thomas
>
> I don't see how your response relates to my original question. This is
> the second time in a short while you decided to work this way.
>
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 04:21:23PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > If I understand well,
Le Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 04:33:55PM +, Jeremy Stanley a écrit :
> On 2019-09-01 14:17:21 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> > I'm looking into our tooling in regards of python2 removal and
> > noticed that https://github.com/eucalyptus/ looks basically dead
>
> The https://eucalyptus.cloud/
