On 21/04/13 at 21:23 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:01:03PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
One point that I think that is important to make, is that points of view
diverge on the question of software as a service, and that the answer is
external to the foundation
On 09/05/13 at 10:05 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:10:25AM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
even though most or all of Debian's public cloud images don't yet
count as official by Lucas's definition
Uh? Can you expand on why you think it is the case? AFAICT the
On 13/05/13 at 11:15 -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
I agree it seems fine to me at that point, though Lucas hasn't yet
said in this thread whether he is okay with Debian hosting an official
image build tool on GitHub instead of Alioth (see the wording he put
on his draft wiki page today
Thanks for the slides and the notes.
On 21/10/13 at 13:25 -0700, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
Lucas gave me some thoughts privately when I sent this to him a while back,
but I'll leave it to him to repost his thoughts publicly.
So. The added value of official Debian images is _trust_.
On 14/04/14 at 07:25 -0700, Tyler Riddle wrote:
There are going to be some tough questions here and while reading them please
ask yourself the following question: whom is the work of the cloud team
supposed to be helping?
1) Exactly what is the charter of the cloud team?
On 24/08/15 at 14:55 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
On 08/24/2015 02:06 PM, Olivier Berger wrote:
Last week at DebConf15, we have discussed with Emmanuel Kasper (glad to
have finally met, btw :-), the issue of official Debian images.
I think that Emmanuel has been able to
On 25/07/16 at 16:32 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/20/2016 12:03 PM, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> > I don't mind if there is a task/metapkg called "EC2-optimal",
> > "OpenStack-Optimized", whatever. but the default image on each cloud
> > provider should be as close as possible to debian
On 11/08/16 at 14:13 -0700, Zach Marano wrote:
> We are organizing a Debian cloud sprint to focus on subjects like:
> - What does it mean to run Debian in the cloud.
> - Define the official Debian cloud image.
> - In depth look at how Debian works on current cloud platforms (AWS, Azure,
On 21/07/16 at 09:45 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 03:48:23PM +0100, Marcin Kulisz a écrit :
> > do you think that there is still need for mirror on AWS once we have
> > CloudFront
> > CDN which is working quite nicely from within AWS?
> Hi Marcin,
> I think
On 20/07/16 at 11:26 +0200, Thomas Lange wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:17:15 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org>
> >>>>> said:
> > I noticed because #830353, #830452 and #831249 are triggered by this.
On 20/07/16 at 19:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I would rather propose the reverse approach, that if a change is successful
> for cloud images, then it is a good idea to propose to extend it to more
> use cases.
Note that to judge if a change is successful, its rationale should be
On 19/07/16 at 19:10 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> writes:
> Lucas> by this. One could argue that those test suites are a bit
> Lucas> fragile, but on the other hand, I would expect a
On 20/07/16 at 22:29 +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> Hi Lucas (and list),
> Most of this was from this work:
> This was to ensure that the Debian images were as optimal as possible
On 21/06/17 at 17:00 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
> > Debian has provided official vagrant base boxes in 2 flavors - one without
> > the VirtualBox guest additions
> > and the other with the guest additions, since the Jessie release. With
> > Stretch released a few days back,
> > only the
On 26/07/17 at 14:27 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
> On 07/26/2017 01:45 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On 21/06/17 at 17:00 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
> >>> Debian has provided official vagrant base boxes in 2 flavors - one
On 16/08/17 at 18:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Remaining action items are:
> - fix the cleanup in the script that installs the guest additions
I've done that, and pushed my code to master.
Emmanuel, at this point, I think that the contrib-stretch image could be
uploaded (so that th
Since I had a need for it, I updated the testing64 Vagrant box, and
added a contrib-testing64 box (with vboxsf module).
On 07/01/19 at 10:23 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi Lucas
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 08:51:33AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Are there any plans to offer Debian AMIs for them?
On 10/01/19 at 08:25 -0800, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:08:08AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > > Are there any plans to offer Debian AMIs for them?
> > > > See
> > > > https://salsa.debian.org/cloud-team/debian-cloud-images/merge_requests/46
> > > I see that the MR has
AWS now offers ARM instances:
Are there any plans to
On https://hub.docker.com/_/debian, there's:
> Where to file issues:
Are those official images? I'm surprised by official Debian images
pointing to a non-free web service. I
On 12/07/19 at 20:15 -0500, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
> Hey, neat that we have convenient VM's now for Debian! Could we get a VM
> for sid as well?
That's difficult, because unstable is frequently in a broken state...
What is your use case? (and why isn't it met by the testing64 and
pdates, that aren't necessarily available in the testing repositories.
> Hmm, maybe we could do a daily VM push and ignore broken states? This would
> be a "best effort" artifact.
> > On Oct 6, 2019, at 6:27 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi
On 28/04/20 at 11:40 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
> Hi Lucas
> While working on building the vagrant boxes with FAI, I noticed that
> some virtualbox drivers where loaded altough I didn't compile them with
> It turns out that the vbox
Mail list logo