Re: Please let's not talk about clouds

2013-04-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/04/13 at 21:23 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:01:03PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: One point that I think that is important to make, is that points of view diverge on the question of software as a service, and that the answer is external to the foundation

Re: Aw: Re: Adding cloud-init in the next Wheezy point release

2013-05-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 09/05/13 at 10:05 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:10:25AM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote: even though most or all of Debian's public cloud images don't yet count as official by Lucas's definition Uh? Can you expand on why you think it is the case? AFAICT the

Re: official images status quo

2013-05-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 13/05/13 at 11:15 -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote: I agree it seems fine to me at that point, though Lucas hasn't yet said in this thread whether he is okay with Debian hosting an official image build tool on GitHub instead of Alioth (see the wording he put on his draft wiki page today

Re: Long-overdue slides and notes from the DC13 official Debian images BoF

2013-10-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, Thanks for the slides and the notes. On 21/10/13 at 13:25 -0700, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote: Lucas gave me some thoughts privately when I sent this to him a while back, but I'll leave it to him to repost his thoughts publicly. Right. So. The added value of official Debian images is _trust_.

Re: Definition of output of cloud project and discussion about possibly needed policies

2014-04-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Tyler, On 14/04/14 at 07:25 -0700, Tyler Riddle wrote: [...] There are going to be some tough questions here and while reading them please ask yourself the following question: whom is the work of the cloud team supposed to be helping? 1) Exactly what is the charter of the cloud team?

Re: Requirements for official Debian images

2015-08-26 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 24/08/15 at 14:55 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: On 08/24/2015 02:06 PM, Olivier Berger wrote: Hi. Last week at DebConf15, we have discussed with Emmanuel Kasper (glad to have finally met, btw :-), the issue of official Debian images. :) I think that Emmanuel has been able to

Re: non-standard TCP tunings in EC2 images

2016-07-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 25/07/16 at 16:32 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 07/20/2016 12:03 PM, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote: > > I don't mind if there is a task/metapkg called "EC2-optimal", > > "OpenStack-Optimized", whatever. but the default image on each cloud > > provider should be as close as possible to debian

Re: Call For Participation Debian Cloud Sprint

2016-08-11 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 11/08/16 at 14:13 -0700, Zach Marano wrote: > We are organizing a Debian cloud sprint to focus on subjects like: > - What does it mean to run Debian in the cloud. > - Define the official Debian cloud image. > - In depth look at how Debian works on current cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, > GCE,

Bug#698477: Do we really need mirror in AWS?

2016-07-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/07/16 at 09:45 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 03:48:23PM +0100, Marcin Kulisz a écrit : > > > > do you think that there is still need for mirror on AWS once we have > > CloudFront > > CDN which is working quite nicely from within AWS? > > Hi Marcin, > > I think

Re: non-standard TCP tunings in EC2 images

2016-07-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/07/16 at 11:26 +0200, Thomas Lange wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:17:15 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> > >>>>> said: > > > I noticed because #830353, #830452 and #831249 are triggered by this. > >

Re: non-standard TCP tunings in EC2 images

2016-07-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/07/16 at 19:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I would rather propose the reverse approach, that if a change is successful > for cloud images, then it is a good idea to propose to extend it to more > use cases. Note that to judge if a change is successful, its rationale should be documented,

Re: non-standard TCP tunings in EC2 images

2016-07-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 19/07/16 at 19:10 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > >>>>> "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> writes: > > Lucas> by this. One could argue that those test suites are a bit > Lucas> fragile, but on the other hand, I would expect a

Re: non-standard TCP tunings in EC2 images

2016-07-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/07/16 at 22:29 +0800, James Bromberger wrote: > Hi Lucas (and list), > > Most of this was from this work: > > http://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2015-03-03/performance-tuning-linux-instances-on-ec2.html > > > This was to ensure that the Debian images were as optimal as possible > within

Bug#865269: cloud.debian.org: Please provide an official contrib-stretch64 vagrant base box

2017-07-26 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 21/06/17 at 17:00 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: > > Debian has provided official vagrant base boxes in 2 flavors - one without > > the VirtualBox guest additions > > and the other with the guest additions, since the Jessie release. With > > Stretch released a few days back, > > only the

Bug#865269: cloud.debian.org: Please provide an official contrib-stretch64 vagrant base box

2017-08-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 26/07/17 at 14:27 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: > On 07/26/2017 01:45 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 21/06/17 at 17:00 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: > >>> Debian has provided official vagrant base boxes in 2 flavors - one > >&g

Bug#865269: cloud.debian.org: Please provide an official contrib-stretch64 vagrant base box

2017-08-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 16/08/17 at 18:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Remaining action items are: > - fix the cleanup in the script that installs the guest additions I've done that, and pushed my code to master. Emmanuel, at this point, I think that the contrib-stretch image could be uploaded (so that th

Vagrant box testing64 updated ; contrib-testing64 added

2018-06-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, FYI: Since I had a need for it, I updated the testing64 Vagrant box, and added a contrib-testing64 box (with vboxsf module). Lucas

Re: Any plans for AWS ARM image?

2019-01-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 07/01/19 at 10:23 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi Lucas > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 08:51:33AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Are there any plans to offer Debian AMIs for them? > > See > https://salsa.debian.org/cloud-team/debian-cloud-images/merge_requests/46 Th

Re: Any plans for AWS ARM image?

2019-01-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 10/01/19 at 08:25 -0800, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:08:08AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > > > Are there any plans to offer Debian AMIs for them? > > > > See > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/cloud-team/debian-cloud-images/merge_requests/46 > > > I see that the MR has

Any plans for AWS ARM image?

2019-01-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, AWS now offers ARM instances: https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2018/11/introducing-amazon-ec2-a1-instances/ https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/a1/ https://aws.amazon.com/fr/blogs/aws/new-ec2-instances-a1-powered-by-arm-based-aws-graviton-processors/ Are there any plans to

Bug#925530: cloud.debian.org: Debian docker images pointing to github for bug tracking

2019-03-26 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: cloud.debian.org Severity: important Hi, On https://hub.docker.com/_/debian, there's: > Where to file issues: > https://github.com/debuerreotype/docker-debian-artifacts/issues Are those official images? I'm surprised by official Debian images pointing to a non-free web service. I

Bug#931964: Add sid to Vagrant Cloud boxes

2019-10-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 12/07/19 at 20:15 -0500, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: > Hey, neat that we have convenient VM's now for Debian! Could we get a VM > for sid as well? That's difficult, because unstable is frequently in a broken state... What is your use case? (and why isn't it met by the testing64 and

Bug#931964: Add sid to Vagrant Cloud boxes

2019-10-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
pdates, that aren't necessarily available in the testing repositories. > > Hmm, maybe we could do a daily VM push and ignore broken states? This would > be a "best effort" artifact. > > > On Oct 6, 2019, at 6:27 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > Hi

Re: Virtualbox guest extensions drivers to be included in kernel tree

2020-06-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
francis.gar...@umontpellier.fr Hi Emmanuel, On 28/04/20 at 11:40 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: > Hi Lucas > > While working on building the vagrant boxes with FAI, I noticed that > some virtualbox drivers where loaded altough I didn't compile them with > DKMS. > > It turns out that the vbox