❦ 5 août 2014 22:56 +0200, Tomasz Rybak tomasz.ry...@post.pl :
I'm testing bootstrap-vz and it would like to install dhcpcd but it is
not present on Jessie.
isc-dhcp-client and isc-dhcp-common are intentionally excluded during
bootstrapping and our wiki also recommends avoiding them:
❦ 3 mai 2015 04:43 +0200, Eirik Schwenke debian-li...@s.hypertekst.net :
I was wondering; are there any plans to make it more usable as a
regular user? It seems it shouldn't be necessary to run it as root (at
least not in all use-cases)?
Have a look at unshare which allows to become root
❦ 12 novembre 2015 16:34 +0100, Thomas Goirand :
>>> I just created wiki page[1] where we could put those requirements. It's
>>> simple but should do the job.
>>>
>>> 1. https://wiki.debian.org/Cloud/Images_requirements
>>
>> Currently, both the Openstack images and the image
❦ 11 novembre 2015 17:49 GMT, Marcin Kulisz :
>> I would suggest we open a seperate thread on the debian-cloud mailing
>> list for defining a list of official requirements for all vendors. As
>> long as we define the first version of that list i would suggest though
>> that
❦ 30 novembre 2015 22:31 +0900, Charles Plessy :
>> > In the case of cloud images, wouldn't that problem be solved by pinning the
>> > backports suite at a low priority, and pinning the installed backports
>> > (cloud-init, etc.) at a higher priority ?
>
> Le Sat, Nov 28,
❦ 26 novembre 2015 08:25 -0500, Brian Gupta :
>> On the Stable release, we have updates for the Kernel to add new
>> drivers, previously not supported. I really consider that the support of
>> new clouds (for example through an update of cloud-init) is exactly the
>>
❦ 23 novembre 2015 00:28 GMT, Steve McIntyre :
> That's a very good question, and one I'll admit that I'd not paid much
> attention to. Unless the images are set up to auto-update at boot (is
> that a sensible thing? Do any of the published images do this?)
Yes, it is part of
❦ 1 avril 2016 00:13 +0200, Thomas Goirand :
>> See Riku's talk at DebConf Heidelberg - there are many tools and
>> it would be generally better for customized tools to give way to
>> generalist tools which can use wrappers or enhancements to provide the
>> remaining
❦ 2 février 2017 21:42 -0800, Noah Meyerhans :
>> overall the image looks fine, no extraneous things, sysctl is clean,
>> etc. great job. :)
>
> Interesting that you bring up sysctl. I consider it a bug that we're
> currently running with an unmodified set of sysctl
❦ 7 février 2017 15:49 GMT, Jeremy Stanley :
>> This may be true post jessie, but AFAIU, the 'OpenStack' data source isn't
>> supported out of the box in Jessie's version of cloud-init (see
>> #841315), and one may have to explicitely customize with a change of the
>> config
❦ 1 février 2017 19:05 +0100, Olivier Berger
:
> I have already some basic knowledge of bootstrap-vz, which I've used
> with VirtualBox and Vagrant providers, thanks. But I'm wondering whether
> anyone documented the specifics of OpenStack.
>
> Maybe you're
❦ 18 novembre 2016 08:02 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas :
> What i would be willing to accept thought, would be a
> /current-8/debian-current-openstack-amd64.qcow2 link which points to the
> latest Debian Jessie image. That way people will not need to ajust their
> scripts once we
❦ 29 mars 2017 14:04 +0300, Lars Wirzenius :
> Current status is that it builds a Debian image (assuming you're
> running vmdb2 on amd64), but doesn't install a bootloader. My attempts
> to get grub-install to work have resulted in my laptop's bootloader
> being inadvertently
❦ 23 juin 2017 13:46 GMT, Joonas Kylmälä :
> Thank you Vincent for taking a look onto this issue. I identified that
> at least these two files enable non-free software:
> templates/sources.list.ubuntu.tmpl and
> templates/sources.list.debian.tmpl. In Ubuntu's case the
Package: cloud-init
Version: 0.7.9-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi!
By default, cloud-init enables the non-free repositories. It
shouldn't. I even wonder if this should not be fixed in
stable/oldstable too.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
❦ 23 juin 2017 15:13 GMT, Joonas Kylmälä :
> thanks Vincent for the help you gave about creating a patch! The patch
> is attached to this email. I'm pretty confident with the modifications
> to "sources.list.debian.tmpl" but for "sources.list.ubuntu.tmpl" I would
> like
❦ 1 juin 2017 11:38 -0700, Zach Marano :
> I haven't found the definitive answer to this question yet. Does Stretch
> use predictive network interface names and systemd-networkd by
> default?
Predicitive network interface names are enabled by default. However,
❦ 1 juin 2017 13:23 -0700, Zach Marano :
> So does this mean you still need to hard code the interface names (which
> for all intents and purposes may not be static across different hardware)
> into /etc/network/interfaces when using predictive network interface names?
>
❦ 10 janvier 2018 12:05 GMT, Steve McIntyre :
> 8.10.3-20180110
>
> Updates in 1 source package(s), 1 binary package(s):
>
> Source linux-latest, binaries: linux-image-amd64:amd64
> linux-latest (63+deb8u1) jessie-security; urgency=medium
>
> * Update to 3.16.0-5
❦ 17 novembre 2019 23:40 +01, Johannes Schauer :
> As I explained in the first paragraph of my initial email, I'm trying to find
> an alternative to creating a bootable disk image myself that I can then use on
> salsa CI runners (for example inside autopkgtests). So there is no metadata
>
❦ 18 novembre 2019 15:46 +01, Johannes Schauer :
> Unfortunately, it doesn't help in my situation because my original problem is
> that due to missing functionality (like losetup, mount or kpartx) in the
> autopkgtest runners I cannot create disk images so I cannot create a disk
> image
> of
❦ 2 juin 2020 15:17 +02, Bastian Blank:
> [ The original mail was sent to use privately ]
>
> Hi Jared
[...]
I think you forgot to put him in copy. Or maybe Bcc?
> This is the result if incompatible dependencies in the agent and Gnome.
> waagent for now requires ifupdown as the network
22 matches
Mail list logo