On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:41:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Okay, so here's the alternate proposal. I understand Raul at least
disagrees with paragraph (3) (and obviously the conclusions based on
that), but I'm not sure we have any good way of noting that difference
of opinion -- perhaps we
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 345067 tech-ctte
Bug#345067: [powerpc] ide-generic is not built on powerpc, yaird tries to
include it and fails
Bug#343427: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc: Installation fails
Bug reassigned from package `yaird' to `tech-ctte'.
thanks
Stopping
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:03:17AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Subject: Re: Processed: Escalating #345067 to the technical comittee, as
the maintainer asked me to do so, and is unable or unwilling to
do his job without this.
reassign 345067 tech-ctte
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:15:56PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I am severly disapointed with you, and you are a liar by claiming that i
Sven, there is no need to call anyone a liar.
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:43:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:03:17AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Subject: Re: Processed: Escalating #345067 to the technical comittee, as
the maintainer asked me to do so, and is unable or unwilling to
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:14:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:15:56PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I am severly disapointed with you, and you are a liar by claiming that i
Sven, there is no need to call anyone a liar.
Well, he is lying about this, he refused to
Andreas Barth writes (Re: Status of resolutions about TC tweaks):
We establish a rule that we won't make decisions on issues that are
ready. This means,
- for overruling a package maintainer's decision, an appropriate package
for an NMU exists, and if we overrule, we upload that NMU;
- for
On 3/7/06, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:20:31PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please see http://wiki.debian.org/LinuxKernelIdeProblem that I created
today and have invited the kernel team and udev developers to improve
on.
An assembly of patent ...
It
Steve Langasek writes (Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main):
Given that the constitution does specify the use of the standard resolution
procedure, I think the right answer here is to have a single ballot with
both proposals on it, so that we have an opportunity to rank the options
in glorious
Here is a version of Anthony's `put it in main' resolution made into a
suggestion rather than an instruction. Below you'll find a diff for
your comfort and convenience.
WHEREAS
1. The committee has been asked by Robert Millan, the submitter of
Bug#353278 and a former developer, to overrule
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:15:56PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I am severly disapointed with you, and you are a liar by claiming that i
didn't hear your arguments, i did hear them, and when i tried to give mines,
you refused to continue the conversation. I remember well your arguments, and
they
Raul Miller writes (Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main):
On 3/7/06, Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a version of Anthony's `put it in main' resolution made into a
suggestion rather than an instruction. Below you'll find a diff for
your comfort and convenience.
I vote
12 matches
Mail list logo
