Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:56:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367709: Call for vote: gcc: requesting libstdc++.udeb
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bdale Garbee) writes:
> I hereby call for an immediate TC vote on the question of whether a
> libstdc++ udeb should be created to support the use of C++ in the
> debian-installer environment, as requested by bug #367709.
While I would be pleased to see responses from Ian and M
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:09:46AM +0100, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> The udeb structure was invented for debian-installer, and to date
> Debian has not supported the use of udebs for any other purpose.
(With ftpmaster hat: I would expect non d-i uses of udebs to be in a
different section of the archiv
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [ 3 ] Choice 1: a libstdc++ udeb should be created as per bug #367709
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: a libstdc++ udeb should not be created despite bug #367709
> [ 2 ] Choice 3: Further discussion
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anyth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bdale Garbee) writes:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [ 3 ] Choice 1: a libstdc++ udeb should be created as per bug #367709
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: a libstdc++ udeb should not be created despite bug #367709
> [ 2 ] Choice 3: Further discu
* Bdale Garbee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070622 01:34]:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: a libstdc++ udeb should be created as per bug #367709
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: a libstdc++ udeb should not be created despite bug #367709
> [ 3 ] Choice 3: Furt
6 matches
Mail list logo