On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 07:33:19PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I would add a suggestion to the resolution that the CTTE invites
the ftp-masters to share their reasons with the package maintainer,
but otherwise the draft above looks OK.
Ok.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:05:50PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
b. There are lots of issues why qmail doesn't look too competitive,
like the static user ids,
I don't see any other mention of static user ids in this discussion. Can
you explain what the problem is there? Are these static IDs
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:46:31AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
We have experimental, though there is nothing in effect that prevents a
maintainer to upload experimental packages to unstable atm...
Packages only in experimental are ignored by Release and Security, so that
would address part
* Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [090823 11:32]:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:05:50PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
b. There are lots of issues why qmail doesn't look too competitive,
like the static user ids,
I don't see any other mention of static user ids in this discussion. Can
you
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 02:32:36AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:05:50PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
ignorance of rfc 3464
This is one that I would like to see more discussion about; I've definitely
found qmail's non-standard DSNs irksome, looking like
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
I suggest the following resolution as a ballot option:
[...]
Thoughts on this?
I think this is a more complete option that what I had proposed; I'd
like to see it replace my proposed option, unless someone else feels
that the more limited option is
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
I am concerned that this has gone to a vote without any actual
answers to the questions posed in
20090812062208.gf9...@rzlab.ucr.edu.
I interpreted Andi's response as one answer, and the lack of any
additional messages as an indication that there
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 02:22:32AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Certainly, I see a number of issues on
http://home.pages.de/~mandree/qmail-bugs.html that I would not like to see
in any package in the archive, not just the delayed-reject bug, and I would
like to know from Gerrit which of the
Steve == Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Steve Qmail does not value the contents of a bounce
Steve message. Dan documents this in a subordinate clause of his
Steve qmail reliability FAQ. That means: if your qmail is
Steve bouncing mail and at the same time, your system
Sam == Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org writes:
Steve == Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Steve Qmail does not value the contents of a bounce message. Dan
Steve documents this in a subordinate clause of his qmail
Steve reliability FAQ. That means: if your qmail is bouncing
10 matches
Mail list logo
