Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 05:22, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
I agree with the statement that maintainers of those packages need to
be active in these discussions and be clear about what their
requirements are and not block other work that's going on
Hi,
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
* Give python-defaults, python3-defaults, python-central and
setuptools/distribute packages to a team chosen by CTTE and accepted by
bug submitters. If they will choose to include me, the first thing I
will propose to do after releasing
* Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org) [100705 23:28]:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 21:46, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
Here's my proposal:
* Ask Barry to join Matthias (and Matthias to accept Barry) as
adding Barry (if he accepts, of course) to the maints of python would
be a huge
* Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org) [100706 00:24]:
Ok, probably I didn't express myself clearly enough. you are talking
about the future, when python will have co-maintainers
(python*-default already has them), am I correct? I was referring
instead to the current situation where python*-default
[Sandro Tosi, 2010-07-05]
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 21:46, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
interpreter packages maintainer¹ (pythonX.Y packages) and encourage
both of them to find someone who cares about Debian first (so without
�...@ubuntu.com or @canonical.com email address) - make
On 07/06/2010 12:04 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Steve Langasek, 2010-07-06]
I think the python
packages ought to have more than two comaintainers, and there are any number
of folks with no Ubuntu affiliation who might join the team - you yourself
would be a prime candidate, IMHO.
I don't
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:39:58PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
If people had asked to have me fired from a job I was doing (in Debian or
elsewhere), you can be certain that sitting down and having a nice chat with
them would be very low on my priority list. I would focus my attention on
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 12:55:28PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Matthias (Ubuntu/Debian maintainer), Barry (upstream), and one pure
Debian developer is not enough? How many maintainers would be enough?
I would not count Matthias too much here, he has proven that he disappears
from
doing
[ Disclaimer: Random bits from my brain only ]
Il 05/07/2010 19.45, Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
Other than the question of when to make the initial upload of a new version
of
the Python interpreter to Unstable, most of the issues at the core of this
request have to do with maintenance of
* Luca Falavigna (dktrkr...@debian.org) [100706 18:09]:
[...]
I'm agreeing to most things you said.
Things are moving, and this is good. There are several things to be
discussed and implemented before we can claim Python issue solved. I
believe Scott and Piotr are great guys with strong
Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote on 2010-07-05 17:46:
If nobody want to do maintaining the lilo package I could do it and I
would do it.
My proposal:
From my side I believe I could work together with Matt Arnold. I see the
following cases:
A) Matt Arnold as Maintainer, myself as
On 07/06/2010 05:48 PM, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote on 2010-07-05 17:46:
If nobody want to do maintaining the lilo package I could do it and I
would do it.
My proposal:
From my side I believe I could work together with Matt Arnold. I see the
12 matches
Mail list logo
