On 24.10.2012 03:29, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Don, in your option 4B, I wonder if it would be a good idea to have the
> depend be something like g-n-m|wicd|no-network-manager
The "gnome" meta-package certainly won't get an alternative dependency
on wicd. That would be completely stupid and miss the p
Don Armstrong writes:
> Just a reminder that the next meeting is at
> date -d 'October 25 2012 17:00 UTC' on #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org
> The agenda is here:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/debian-ctte.git;a=blob;f=meetings/agenda.txt;hb=HEAD
> feel free to update it if
Don, in your option 4B, I wonder if it would be a good idea to have the
depend be something like g-n-m|wicd|no-network-manager
ANd have an empty extra package that users can install if they really
want neither n-m or wicd?
While I don't get a vote, I think that would be a reasonable option if
yo
Just a reminder that the next meeting is at
date -d 'October 25 2012 17:00 UTC' on #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org
The agenda is here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/debian-ctte.git;a=blob;f=meetings/agenda.txt;hb=HEAD
feel free to update it if necessary.
Don Armstrong
--
M
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This bug is to track this issue. Please send all discussion on this
> topic only to this bug report. I will make sure that the gnome
> maintainers are pointed to this bug report.
Discussion seems to have stopped on this bug; I have drafted an
additional se
5 matches
Mail list logo