On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 06:00:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be writes:
My understanding is that the point of virtual packages is so that
several *can* provide it. But you're now telling 1 package that it
can't do that, while you instead could say only one
* Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [140322 01:39]:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:38:15PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
In general I worry that your interpretation of resolution texts
focuses far too much on the exact words used, and far too little on
the substance of the underlying issues.
In
2 matches
Mail list logo
