Hi,
I would like to see an end to open questions on systemd in Jessie.
So, given that the GR is over and no technical proposals for not
switching init systems on upgrade to Jessie have been made, is it
possible to draw a conclusion to this issue now? I'm not sure there is
much to gain from
I am resigning from the Technical Committee with immediate effect.
While it is important that the views of the 30-40% of the project who
agree with me should continue to be represented on the TC, I myself am
clearly too controversial a figure at this point to do so. I should
step aside to try
Ian Jackson wrote:
I now hope to spend more of my free software time doing programming.
dgit is at the top of my Debian queue, but some of my GNU and SGO
projects could do with attention too.
Hi Ian,
I've been quite impressed with your technical contributions to Debian,
particularly dgit, and
Hey.
On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 17:34 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I resign from the Debian Technical Committee, effective immediately.
What a shame :-(
Thanks for your many years of excellent work.
I think this is a very big loss for the TC and Debian, since you showed
great wisdom and technical
Hey.
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 13:08 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
I am resigning from the Technical Committee with immediate effect.
Again, what a shame :-(
Thanks for all your work, I'd say the same what I've just written about
Russ applies to you as well.
You far-sight and technical knowledge will be
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 13:51 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi,
I would like to see an end to open questions on systemd in Jessie.
So, given that the GR is over and no technical proposals for not
switching init systems on upgrade to Jessie have been made, is it
possible to draw a
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Svante Signell wrote:
4. For the moment, we invite concrete proposals for technical changes
which would arrange that 1. new jessie installations using Linux
would get systemd but 2. existing installations retain their
existing init system so far as possible.
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I have to admit that the code is not exactly lightweight. I do
understand the desire to get rid it and asked that a ctte ruling does
not apply beyond jessie for that reason.
Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the
code
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the
code which will be in jessie? I (perhaps naïvely) would expect them to
be primarily using the code in unstable, and maybe at a late stage of
bring-up
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Ben Longbons wrote:
The code I work on isn't packaged for Debian yet, but without having
cross-compilers to play with, I will *never* be able to support
anything other than x86-*.
Which suite are you currently using? I'm asking, because I want to know
whether actually just
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com writes:
4. For the moment, we invite concrete proposals for technical changes
which would arrange that 1. new jessie installations using Linux
would get systemd but 2. existing installations retain their
existing init system so far as possible.
Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au writes:
The tech ctte could've addressed this issue by providing policy guidance
or by just offering advice, and assuming that the systemd maintainers would
act on the advice or policy in good faith. Choosing to override the
systemd maintainers was far from
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Ben Longbons wrote:
The code I work on isn't packaged for Debian yet, but without having
cross-compilers to play with, I will *never* be able to support
anything other than x86-*.
Which suite are you
Hi Don,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:41:49PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the
code which will be in jessie? I (perhaps naïvely) would expect them to
be primarily using the code in unstable, and maybe at a late stage of
bring-up
14 matches
Mail list logo
