Hello Sam,
On Sat 11 May 2019 at 01:24PM -04, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I agree that it would generally be unfortunate if we had policy text
> that could not be changed by the policy process. I can see rare
> situations where it might happen: we might have legal advice requiring
> specific text be in
Hello Sam,
On Fri 10 May 2019 at 03:57PM -04, Sam Hartman wrote:
> What are people's thoughts about this?
>
> Will this approach work for the TC and policy editors?
I think that the concrete suggestion you're making is that when a
question that comes before the T.C. is something that could be so
Hello Ian,
On Mon 13 May 2019 at 02:50PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> we delegated managing the process to the policy editors, but not the
>> actual policy decisions. They make consensus calls. They use their
>> judgment in a lot of ways.
>
> That is a decision *of* the policy editors. When the
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 12:06:15 +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> currently, inclusion of new init system into Debian requires inclusion into
> pre-dependency of bin:init package, which is unsatisfactory.
>
> As can be followed in #838480, current practice puts maintainer of any
> new init system t
4 matches
Mail list logo
