Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> writes: > * You take issue with "rename.ul" as a program name, because it is > inconsistent with other Linux distributions.
Regarding this, perhaps we ought to ask util-linux's upstream if they'd be willing to install /usr/bin/rename also as /usr/bin/rename.ul[1], thus allowing people to write scripts that are portable across distros. Cheers, Phil. [1] If that is done with a symlink, I presume we'd have a very slight preference for the actual binary to be called `rename.ul`, but it doesn't really matter how it's done as long as people can rely on rename.ul being present, regardless of distro. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature