On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 16:56:24 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Fri 17 Jun 2022 at 01:03AM +02, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > And that's what we are talking about: Debian experts building
> > packages for Debian. At least that's what my priorities are.
> I think Ian might really mean "Debian source
Hello,
On Fri 17 Jun 2022 at 01:03AM +02, gregor herrmann wrote:
> And that's what we are talking about: Debian experts building
> packages for Debian. At least that's what my priorities are.
I think Ian might really mean "Debian source package experts". It ought
to be our goal to make it so
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:08:59 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Helmut Grohne writes ("Re: Bug#1007717: Updated draft resolution"):
> > Simon looked at how other distributions approach patches and figured
> > that basically everyone else uses the patches-unapplied model.
> patches-unapplied is a good
Hello,
On Thu 16 Jun 2022 at 08:47am +02, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> Indeed, and I do agree that 4c is such a clear statement. I would like
> to see a stronger statement here, but Sam et al. tried to gain consensus
> on that and there wasn't. So the CTTE advice probably shouldn't override
> that
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 04:06:55PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> If you look at Debian 'testing' only, I think that the only remaining
> way to do that is 1.0 + quilt (packages that were using dpatch have all
> been converted or removed from testing).
That's good. I wasn't able to locate a
5 matches
Mail list logo
