Re: tech-ctte: More specific advice regarding merged-/usr and implications of #978636

On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 22:10 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Hi, > > Quoting Luca Boccassi (2022-07-18 21:03:14) > > It was renamed following a request on #debian-ftp while it was in > > NEW, as the > > feedback was that 'usrmerge' and 'usrmerged' were too similar and > > thus

Re: tech-ctte: more on merged-/usr

On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:03 -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 06:21, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > That's because we will do all builds on unmerged-usr, until we are > > sure > > everything is switched over (and the autopkgtest/piuparts can also > > be > > turned over) in Bookworm+1,

Re: tech-ctte: More specific advice regarding merged-/usr and implications of #978636

Hi, Quoting Luca Boccassi (2022-07-18 21:03:14) > It was renamed following a request on #debian-ftp while it was in NEW, as the > feedback was that 'usrmerge' and 'usrmerged' were too similar and thus easily > confused. The 'usrmerged' one can be disregarded and will be de-crufted. I think

Re: Slides for the talk

Hello, On Wed 13 Jul 2022 at 03:20PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > Here: https://people.debian.org/~spwhitton/talks/2022/tech-ctte.pdf Updated, please re-fetch. -- Sean Whitton

Re: tech-ctte: More specific advice regarding merged-/usr and implications of #978636

On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 17:53 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Hi all, > > Quoting Luca Boccassi (2022-07-18 16:42:03) > > On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 16:04 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > > wrote: > > > Hi Luca & Helmut, > > > > > > Quoting Helmut Grohne (2022-07-18 14:32:31)

Re: tech-ctte: More specific advice regarding merged-/usr and implications of #978636

Hi all, Quoting Luca Boccassi (2022-07-18 16:42:03) > On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 16:04 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > wrote: > > Hi Luca & Helmut, > > > > Quoting Helmut Grohne (2022-07-18 14:32:31) > > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:56:14AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > A MR is

Re: tech-ctte: More specific advice regarding merged-/usr and implications of #978636

On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 14:32 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Hi Luca, > > Thank you for providing such a detailed and well-rationalized plan for > moving forward. It removes quite an amount of uncertainty about where > we're heading. I've missed this kind of clarity in previous > conversations. > >

Re: tech-ctte: More specific advice regarding merged-/usr and implications of #978636

Hi Luca, Thank you for providing such a detailed and well-rationalized plan for moving forward. It removes quite an amount of uncertainty about where we're heading. I've missed this kind of clarity in previous conversations. On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:56:14AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > A MR