Re: tech-ctte: more on merged-/usr

2022-07-22 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Fri 22 Jul 2022 at 09:31am -06, Sam Hartman wrote: > I respectfully disagree with Helmut who is pushing for an acceptable > technical solution to be on the table before considering acting. > As others have pointed out, it's actually hard to come up with the > energy to improve and refin

Re: tech-ctte: more on merged-/usr

2022-07-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 2022-07-22 at 09:31 -0600, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > > > > "Matthew" == Matthew Vernon writes: > > Matthew> While it's understandable, I am saddened and a bit > worried > Matthew> by the "it's too much hassle to fix dpkg's usr-merge > Matthew> support, let's not bother" message

Re: tech-ctte: more on merged-/usr

2022-07-22 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Matthew" == Matthew Vernon writes: Matthew> While it's understandable, I am saddened and a bit worried Matthew> by the "it's too much hassle to fix dpkg's usr-merge Matthew> support, let's not bother" message I seem to be getting Matthew> from these threads. I agree with y

Re: tech-ctte: more on merged-/usr

2022-07-22 Thread Matthew Vernon
Hi, Not quite sure where in the relevant threads to put this concern, but. On 17/07/2022 14:21, Luca Boccassi wrote: On Sun, 2022-07-17 at 11:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 00:56:14 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: The patch from user uau that the dpkg maintainer rejected