Bug#728486: Current patch for resolving lvm/systemd compatibility

2014-01-30 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Don, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: Do you have an updated patch with this change and a documentation of the tmpfiles.d change? I will draft a resolution shortly to implement this patch, and will open it for discussion. Bastian has uploaded lvm2 2.02.104-1 which contains my patch:

Bug#728486: Current patch for resolving lvm/systemd compatibility

2014-01-18 Thread Michael Stapelberg
. Furthermore I added an [Install] section with WantedBy=local-fs.target, which is normally done outside of the unit by the generator. ② See https://wiki.debian.org/Systemd/Packaging -- Best regards, Michael From 4eecd2d3168ceb30fc5cc4a9049dfe50e462a8f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Stapelberg

Bug#727708: loose ends for init system decision

2013-12-31 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Ian, Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: This is particularly the case for build-dependencies on an avowedly and intentionally non-portable program. Of course this can be made conditional, but this is IMO too fiddly. Adding [linux-any] to the Build-Depends line is not

Bug#727708: systemd socket activation protocol rationale

2013-12-14 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Ian, [still sending this after Uoti’s reply, because my version has some more detail] Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: Why do only some of the environment variables start SD_ ? We have LISTEN_PID and LISTEN_FDS but SD_LISTEN_FDS_START. SD_LISTEN_FDS_START is a #define

Bug#727708: Aribtrarily breaking working interfaces?

2013-12-12 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Steve, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com writes: I've been following #725714 with interest in the last few days. It seems that the arbitrary breakage of the module/firmware loading interface in udev last year [1] is now causing major issues for us and our users in debian-installer. I take

Bug#728486: Current patch for resolving lvm/systemd compatibility

2013-12-02 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Don, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: I'd like to get this particular bug discussion restarted. Thanks for your mail. From my understanding, a static, non generator version of lvm2_activation_generator_systemd_red_hat.c will allow for the activation of lvm2 after the addition of an

Bug#727708: systemd (security) bugs (was: init system question) [and 1 more messages]

2013-11-30 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Ian, Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: My point was that someone who is writing an init system for concurrent startup and dynamic service management needs to have a good understanding of concurrent system design, and in particular of race hazards. I wouldn't expect a

Bug#727708: systemd (security) bugs (was: init system question)

2013-11-28 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Ian, Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: CVE summary Debian BTS Redhat 2012-0871systemd-logind insecure file creation ? 795853 2012-1101DoS from systemctl status 662029 799902

Bug#727708: FYI: upstream’s take

2013-10-28 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi, my apologies for not replying to any messages within the thread, but I think my mail is orthogonal to the other messages. Lennart Poettering wrote about the systemd upstream point of view on the discussion we are currently having: