(I was informed, that my posts are not welcome anymore here. So,
there is last one for all.)
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:05:19PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
Sergey B Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.com writes:
I just wonder why nobody from tect-ctte take care about the exact
specification
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:18:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Given that, your opinions about the quality of GNOME upstream development
don't seem relevant to the problem we're trying to resolve. If you don't
like the software, don't use it.
Unfortunately, it doesn't save us, as the set of
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 06:47:02PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 30 janvier 2014 à 21:38 +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev a écrit :
[Lots of crap]
Nice argumentation, as usual...
Where is the list of problems for sysvinit we intend to solve?
https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:15:02PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Алексей Шилин dixit:
In his talk [2] at 13:50 Marc briefly touched the init system choice
question.
Can you please provide a transcript, for those among us who
do not watch any video?
This talk in article format:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 09:50:49PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
If we were to adopt systemd as pid 1, which sections of the systemd
source code would we probably want to adopt as well ? Or to put it
another way, which other existing programs would be obsoleted ?
Again, very good question. And
5 matches
Mail list logo
