Bug#342455: tech-ctte: Ownership and permissions of device mapper block devices

2005-12-23 Thread Stephen Frost
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Is there some reason you can't have implement your personally preferred policy of root.root 600 on just your own system? Is there some reason for projecting your personal policies incompletely onto an arbitrary subset of debian's users? Hu? 10

Re: (forw) [debian-ctte-request@lists.debian.org: Re: Posting on the list [pasc@murphy.debian.org: Re: md5sum FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]

2004-06-02 Thread Stephen Frost
* Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Stephen Frost writes (Re: (forw) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Posting on the list [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: md5sum FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]): The TC isn't the only committee in Debian. [...] FSVO `committee', this is true. But the TC

(forw) [debian-ctte-request@lists.debian.org: Re: Posting on the list [pasc@murphy.debian.org: Re: md5sum FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]

2004-06-01 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, I'm having to forward this crap because of the stupidity of this list being closed to non-subscribers. Thanks, Stephen - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 17:59:21 -0500 (CDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: (forw) [debian-ctte-request@lists.debian.org: Re: Posting on the list [pasc@murphy.debian.org: Re: md5sum FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]

2004-06-01 Thread Stephen Frost
* Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Stephen Frost writes ((forw) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Posting on the list [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: md5sum FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]): * Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: If the alternatives are a moderated list or one that has

Re: Versioned Symbols

2003-03-19 Thread Stephen Frost
* Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Looks good to me. It can't go into policy yet, though. Not enough machinery, and we really need to have all core libs converted and working to whatever policy we choose before we propose it. Yes, and I consider libpkg-guide to be a place to

Re: Versioned Symbols

2003-03-11 Thread Stephen Frost
* Richard Braakman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I think it would avoid the problem, but it would be a major headache to deal with in practice. It would be as bad as tcl4.* used to be, and I'm glad we left THAT behind. It won't solve the problem, please read my reply to him for a better

Re: Versioned Symbols

2003-03-10 Thread Stephen Frost
* Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: - Conflict between library -dev packages, and -dev packages to depend on correct version of other -dev packages. - Would allow valid setups - Packages may become FTBFS, but when they are fixed, packages work. see

Versioned Symbols

2003-03-07 Thread Stephen Frost
Hey all, Please excuse the (minor) cross-post but I think the technical committee needs to find an answer and that answer then be set in policy. We need to make a decision on how to properly handle multiple library versions ending up linked into the same process. A few of the options