until the
committee asks for your input.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description
been put before us.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:41PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
On 3/2/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With that in mind, policy on contrib says that contrib is for
wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free
programs.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:26:56AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Steve Langasek writes (Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main):
1+5. As noted in my follow-up comments to Ian's proposal, I think the
rationale is great, but I draw the opposite conclusion from it. :)
I'm afraid you'll have
objections to reassigning the bug back to apt-file and
closing this issue out?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:03:56AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
The Section: field of a Debian package's control file is a technical detail
of the package, as is the location of a package on the Debian mirror. You
may consider
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:15:04PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
On 3/1/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The lack of declared dependencies in ndiswrapper isn't a result of trying
to do an end-run around policy, it's a result of the fact that ndiswrapper
does not *have* a dependency
that Condorcet works best.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
that was a statement of intent only, and if we
can come to some agreement again about the term length, I would vote yes.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
voting election thing every month
or two just to routinely elect the chairman.
We can't manage one mail each every two months?
A voting election is one mail?
Well, I think that was the *theory*...
:)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
this vote needs to be Ian has stepped down;
who will succeed him? in order to be binding under the constitution.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 03:22:44PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 06:24:49PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
I agree with the proposal to implement a rotating chair, for the reasons
you've given.
It seems to contradict 6.1.7 of the constitution as written to have
?
Bdale, Manoj, Andi, could you please send in your votes for committee chair
so we can close this out?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
at this point.
Either way, I do agree with Anthony that one-off overrides of maintainers
don't seem like the best way for us to be spending our time.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world
the load a bit more fairly.
I propose we do this, and for concreteness propose the following rotation:
- Feb 14th Ian Jackson
Feb 15th - Mar 31st Steve Langasek
Apr 1st - May 31st Bdale Garbee
Jun 1st - Jul 31st Andreas Barth
Aug 1st - Sep 30th Raul Miller
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:33:34PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
On 2/10/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... follow-up to self: given that crypt-dm sits on top of devmapper, it is
indeed plausible that one would want to prevent members of group disk from
reading the decrypted volume
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:40:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:29:39PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Raul Miller writes (Re: #342455):
I agree that the devmapper default should match other
debian defaults, and vice-versa.
If I may try to channel Bastian Blank
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:46:56AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:40:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Otherwise, having access to the underlying block devices means having access
to meddle with anything on the LVM devices as well.
And who says that anyone have
the following rotation:
- Feb 14th Ian Jackson
Feb 15th - Mar 31st Steve Langasek
Apr 1st - May 31st Bdale Garbee
Jun 1st - Jul 31st Anthony Towns
Aug 1st - Sep 30th Raul Miller
Oct 1st - Nov 30th Andreas Barth
Dec 1st - Jan 31st Ian Jackson
Ordering
301 - 320 of 320 matches
Mail list logo
