On 22/05/14 at 10:14 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:56:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
We have had some discussion about this. No-one seems to have objected
to the suggestion that the DPL, rather than the TC chairman, should
have a casting vote in TC decisions.
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 08:32 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 22/05/14 at 10:14 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:56:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
We have had some discussion about this. No-one seems to have objected
to the suggestion that the DPL, rather than the TC
On 23/05/14 at 09:42 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 08:32 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 22/05/14 at 10:14 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:56:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
We have had some discussion about this. No-one seems to have objected
(Or having to abstain from a vote)
On May 23, 2014 4:45 AM, Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 09:52 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/05/14 at 09:42 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 08:32 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The solution
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com writes:
The solution is simple: Have an odd number of members in the TC. Then no
casting vote is needed at all.
I don't believe that's true, or that any simple transformation of the vote
process can make that true. The casting vote is not used to break
We have had some discussion about this. No-one seems to have objected
to the suggestion that the DPL, rather than the TC chairman, should
have a casting vote in TC decisions.
I'm therefore intending to roll this up into my TC GR(s).
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
]] Ian Jackson
We have had some discussion about this. No-one seems to have objected
to the suggestion that the DPL, rather than the TC chairman, should
have a casting vote in TC decisions.
I think it's a bad idea. The CTTE is a technical body. The DPL is a
political leader. Having
7 matches
Mail list logo
