Re: Bug#727708: init system coupling etc.

2014-02-15 Thread Svante Signell
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [140212 19:00]: Packages should normally support the default Linux init system. There I would drop the word Linux here - Packages should support our default init systems. If you do that then you have killed all non-linux architectures, is that

Re: Bug#727708: init system coupling etc.

2014-02-14 Thread Josh Triplett
Ian Jackson wrote: Josselin Mouette writes (Bug#727708: init system coupling etc.): In all cases, it is unacceptable to put the burden of implementing logind on non-systemd systems on maintainers of packages that just need the logind interfaces. If it is not available, software such as gdm3

Re: Bug#727708: init system coupling etc.

2014-02-13 Thread Andreas Barth
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [140212 19:00]: Packages should normally support the default Linux init system. There I would drop the word Linux here - Packages should support our default init systems. are some exceptional cases where lack of support for the default init system

Re: Bug#727708: init system coupling etc.

2014-02-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org writes: * Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [140212 19:00]: Packages should normally support the default Linux init system. There I would drop the word Linux here - Packages should support our default init systems. That's a much stronger statement than we've