On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:19:47PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:04:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Roger,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:02:52AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Steve Langasek
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Hi Roger,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:02:52AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Because unstable was changing between the rebuilds, some of the
failures are likely due to churn, including multiarch work, so a
failure does not necessarily implicate the patch
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:04:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:02:52AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Because unstable was changing between the rebuilds, some of the
failures are likely due to churn, including multiarch work, so a
failure does not necessarily
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:29:11 +0100, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
I am repeating the builds using a static mirror of unstable as of
today.
Thank you!
Bdale
pgp9IZOhNTgVz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Steve Langasek
Hi,
| 4) Turn on direct use of 'debian/rules build-arch' on the autobuilders for
| all packages in unstable and experimental immediately, with no fallback
|
Hi Roger,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:02:52AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Steve Langasek
| 4) Turn on direct use of 'debian/rules build-arch' on the autobuilders
for
| all packages in unstable and experimental
* Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net, 2011-06-11, 12:19:
7) Failed autodetection
- autodetection failed to detect an existing build-arch target
- unconditional used build-arch
A complete list of packages is at the bottom; these are selected
examples.
Example: spring_0.82.7.1+dfsg1-3
(Sorry to just join this conversation; I was on holiday in Wales,
which was excellent.)
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: Request for TC to rule on a course of action for
supporting build-arch):
I was going to suggest that. The way I prepared the corresponding patch
(the one you called
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
(Sorry to just join this conversation; I was on holiday in Wales,
which was excellent.)
Raphael Hertzog writes:
I was going to suggest that. The way I prepared the corresponding patch
(the one you called auto-detection) already does that
]] Steve Langasek
Hi,
| 4) Turn on direct use of 'debian/rules build-arch' on the autobuilders for
| all packages in unstable and experimental immediately, with no fallback
| if the target does not exist; requires a corresponding update to Policy
| and mass updates to fix packages
* Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) [110607 11:14]:
]] Steve Langasek
Hi,
| 4) Turn on direct use of 'debian/rules build-arch' on the autobuilders for
| all packages in unstable and experimental immediately, with no fallback
| if the target does not exist; requires a corresponding
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
The Technical Committee has sufficient authority to address this
question under any of ยง6.1.{1,2,4,5}. If you prefer, we could also ask
for a referral from the policy editors or the dpkg maintainers, to
eliminate any question of supermajority
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Any chance you can elaborate on what didn't work well? I believe this
will work robustly for packages whose debian/rules is a policy-compliant
makefile, and I think that the handful of packages which don't could
reasonably required to, at minimum,
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [110606 22:05]:
Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org writes:
Option 1 also implies forcing debian/rules to be a Makefile, which is
think is sensible.
Policy already requires this. The only package in the archive for which
this is not already the case is
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:56:22PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
1) Implement support for calling 'debian/rules build-arch' in place of
'debian/rules build' by checking for the presence of the target using
'make -qn'.[1]
Option 1 also implies forcing debian/rules to be a
15 matches
Mail list logo
