]] Don Armstrong
#topic #733452 init system readiness protocol
This was closed by Ian, so why is it on the agenda?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
I looked through this thread and found that I hadn't proposed anything
resembling a concrete resolution. I would like to do that now:
Context
1. A dispute about the status of menu systems in Debian, and the
contents of policy, has been referred to the Committee.
2. There are
Don Armstrong writes (Next CTTE Meeting is date -d 'Thu May 22 17:00:00 UTC
2014' (under 22 hours from now)):
The next CTTE meeting is at
date -d'Thu May 22 17:00:00 UTC 2014'
in #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org (OFTC).
The current agenda is in the git repository, and is reproduced
We discussed this on -project. I have been convinced that my previous
approach was wrong. I now think that we should do as follows:
* Move the required majority ratio test from A.6(3) to
the very end, after A.6(8).
* Change the test to =.
* The consequence of not meeting the majority
We have had some discussion about this. No-one seems to have objected
to the suggestion that the DPL, rather than the TC chairman, should
have a casting vote in TC decisions.
I'm therefore intending to roll this up into my TC GR(s).
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Ian Jackson writes (Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on init
systems):
I do think there is still something for the TC to do here. As Andi
writes, the TC failed to clarify that we expect people to continue to
support multiple init systems. Evidently this was a mistake. It
We have discussed having a minimum discussion period for TC
resolutions.
I still think this is necessary. I think 72h is about right.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
I have concluded that it is not going to be feasible for me to find a
wording for an advisory GR which will achieve my objectives.
I'm therefore dropping it from my personal todo list. I have removed
it from the TC git repo. If someone else wants to pick it up, they'd
have my support.
Thanks,
]] Ian Jackson
We have had some discussion about this. No-one seems to have objected
to the suggestion that the DPL, rather than the TC chairman, should
have a casting vote in TC decisions.
I think it's a bad idea. The CTTE is a technical body. The DPL is a
political leader. Having
Ian Jackson wrote:
Ian Jackson writes (Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on
init systems):
I do think there is still something for the TC to do here. As Andi
writes, the TC failed to clarify that we expect people to continue to
support multiple init systems. Evidently
#debian-ctte Meeting
Meeting started by dondelelcaro at 16:58:06 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ctte/2014/debian-ctte.2014-05-22-16.58.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* Who is here? (dondelelcaro,
11 matches
Mail list logo
