On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 04:16:28PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
5. We therefore overrule the decision of the maintainer of
libpam-systemd binary package. The Depends entry
systemd-sysv | systemd-shim (= 8-2)
should be replaced by
systemd-shim (= 8-2) | systemd-sysv
A
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 04:52:37PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 04:16:28PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
5. We therefore overrule the decision of the maintainer of
libpam-systemd binary package. The Depends entry
systemd-sysv | systemd-shim (= 8-2)
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 04:52:37PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 04:16:28PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
5. We therefore overrule the decision of the maintainer of
libpam-systemd binary package. The Depends entry
On 17 November 2014 05:37, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 04:52:37PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
A decision which lead to another great Debian Developer leave the
ship!
Great Work!
This demonization of the Technical Committee for doing their
]] Anthony Towns
On 17 November 2014 05:37, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
I hope that he doesn't
actually view this TC override as an attack on the systemd maintainers.
... this is the TC providing technical guidance when
asked to do so; and if the TC
Hello everyone,
I resign from the Debian Technical Committee, effective immediately.
Doing this immediately is for the sake of clarity and for some of the
reasons mentioned below, not to cause problems for anyone. I don't
believe any issues are created at this point by an immediate resignation,
Originally, the November meeting was scheduled for the 27th of November,
but as this falls squarely on US Thanksgiving, we discussed last meeting
moving it back to the 4th of December.
I've now done that; if someone has a conflict, please reply, indicating
so, so we can reschedule.
The next CTTE
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 766708 Revert gcc cross-building changes
Bug #766708 [tech-ctte] Request to override gcc maintainer changes breaking
Changed Bug title to 'Revert gcc cross-building changes' from 'Request to
override gcc maintainer changes breaking'
8 matches
Mail list logo
