>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> Manoj Srivastava writes (SuperCite undone):
>> Ian Jackson:
>> > As I understand it, the supposed principle which is being applied is
>> > that it is unacceptable to have a binary in the package which depends
>> > on libraries not mentio
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> In this case then there are several pieces of different information
Ian> which we might record in the BTS severity field:
Ian> (a) The package maintainer's idea of how urgent/important the
Ian> bug is
Ian> (c) Something specified
Anthony Towns writes ("Re: Release-critical bugs, and #97671"):
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 01:34:26AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > But, the idea in the policy manual is that a `must' is a rule for
> > which there are not expected to be exceptions; it doesn't touch on how
> > damaging a breach of th
Anthony Towns writes ("Re: Release-critical bugs, and #97671"):
> It's not clear to me why tech-ctte discussions seem to not get cc'ed to
> the appropriate bug number properly. See also the discussion for the
> pcmcia-cs bug, much of which happened on the list rather than in the
> bug report.
Bug
Manoj Srivastava writes (SuperCite undone):
> Ian Jackson:
> > As I understand it, the supposed principle which is being applied is
> > that it is unacceptable to have a binary in the package which depends
> > on libraries not mentioned in Depends, and that Recommends or Suggests
> > are not suffic
5 matches
Mail list logo