On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 12:08 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Julien BLACHE wrote:
I think it would be best if this matter would be decided upon before
the release of Squeeze, or not too long after it, so as to avoid
further breakages in early kernel updates for Squeeze.
I
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 12:08 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Julien BLACHE wrote:
I think it would be best if this matter would be decided upon before
the release of Squeeze, or not too long after it, so as to avoid
further
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
So currently there is no guarantee that a specific ABI maintains any
kind of compatibility for out of tree modules; it is a best effort based
on the kernel maintainer's understanding of what symbols have changed
and what out of tree (or even in-tree)
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 12:23 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 12:08 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Julien BLACHE wrote:
I think it would be best if this matter would be decided upon before
the release of
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 15:55 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 12:23 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
or possibly by using Breaks: for all of the affected out-of-tree
modules where the change wasn't wide-spread enough to bump the ABI
5 matches
Mail list logo
