(Bcc to debian-dpkg for info)
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
If this were to be put to a vote today, I would propose the following ballot
options:
1) Implement support for calling 'debian/rules build-arch' in place of
'debian/rules build' by checking for the presence of the
]] Steve Langasek
Hi,
| 4) Turn on direct use of 'debian/rules build-arch' on the autobuilders for
| all packages in unstable and experimental immediately, with no fallback
| if the target does not exist; requires a corresponding update to Policy
| and mass updates to fix packages
On 07/06/11 at 09:41 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Lucas, can you do a full rebuild with the packages below ?
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.16.1~buildarch.1_all.deb
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/libdpkg-perl_1.16.1~buildarch.1_all.deb
Hi,
Since Tollef
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Steve Langasek
Hi,
| 4) Turn on direct use of 'debian/rules build-arch' on the autobuilders for
| all packages in unstable and experimental immediately, with no fallback
| if the target does not exist; requires
* Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) [110607 11:14]:
]] Steve Langasek
Hi,
| 4) Turn on direct use of 'debian/rules build-arch' on the autobuilders for
| all packages in unstable and experimental immediately, with no fallback
| if the target does not exist; requires a corresponding
5 matches
Mail list logo