On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:37:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
To the Project Secretary: Ian raised the point that he feels that option
A should not require 3:1. The Provides: libjpeg-dev here is
essentially a technical device to ensure that packages can declare
Build-Depends: libjpeg-dev
(resending because of some 8-bit header damage)
Kurt Roeckx writes (Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution):
So if you really want to prevent using a supermajority, I suggest
you write is so that you at least don't mention the other package
by name but make it more general.
Seriously ?
I also
* Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [140322 00:39]:
(resending because of some 8-bit header damage)
Kurt Roeckx writes (Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution):
So if you really want to prevent using a supermajority, I suggest
you write is so that you at least don't mention the
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:38:15PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
In general I worry that your interpretation of resolution texts
focuses far too much on the exact words used, and far too little on
the substance of the underlying issues.
In this particular case we have two packages both of which
Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be writes:
My understanding is that the point of virtual packages is so that
several *can* provide it. But you're now telling 1 package that it
can't do that, while you instead could say only one (other) package can
do it in this case.
That's one use of virtual
5 matches
Mail list logo
