Le 2014-05-06 13:06, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
I believe he is unfriendly with unfriendly people, and I don't think
you
count as one of his friend, given the way you've interacted with him
in
the past.
Well, Raphael is not Daniel's friend... fine. But, actually, who cares?
The
maintainer
Mehdi Dogguy writes (Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on
init systems):
Well, Raphael is not Daniel's friend... fine. But, actually, who
cares? The maintainer should go over those details and simply does
his job. What raphael is trying to explain is that he failed in his
Thanks Ian, this is exactly what I think as well, and you expressed it a
way better than I would have.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Can we stop the general commentary on Daniel Baumann's performance as
maintainer ? I don't think it's helpful or relevant to the discussion
about tftp-hpa and upstart.
Is there still anything left to discuss on tftp-hpa/upstart or could
Ansgar Burchardt writes (Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on
init systems):
Is there still anything left to discuss on tftp-hpa/upstart or could
this issue be closed? The last upload restored support for upstart[1].
[1]
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
I do think there is still something for the TC to do here. As Andi
writes, the TC failed to clarify that we expect people to continue to
support multiple init systems. Evidently this was a mistake.
On what grounds do you think it was a
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:15:48PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ansgar Burchardt writes (Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote
on init systems):
Is there still anything left to discuss on tftp-hpa/upstart or could
this issue be closed? The last upload restored support for
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
I don't have a problem with this myself; does anyone have a problem with
date -d'Thu May 22 17:00:00 UTC 2014'?
Based on the responses received, we'll hold the next CTTE meeting at
date -d'Thu May 22 17:00:00 UTC 2014'?
in #debian-ctte on
On 05/06/14 23:15, Ian Jackson wrote:
For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes
merging reasonable contributions, and not reverting existing
support without a compelling reason.
Considering:
- The technical
Faidon Liambotis parav...@debian.org writes:
I haven't gotten any such bug reports, so this is still theoretical, but
I think I'd simply reject anything more complicated than simply adding a
debian/foo.upstart file to the tree, including adding (and maintaining)
hacks or modifying existing
El Tue, 6 de May 2014 a las 7:54 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org
escribió:
Faidon Liambotis parav...@debian.org writes:
I haven't gotten any such bug reports, so this is still
theoretical, but
I think I'd simply reject anything more complicated than simply
adding a
debian/foo.upstart file
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Russ Allbery writes (Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on
init systems):
On what grounds do you think it was a mistake? As soon as someone talked
to the maintainer in question and asked them to re-add support, support
was
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
I can see your point that the future of upstart is possibly unclear, but
my feeling is that if anyone filed a bug against a package requesting
upstart support, that's sufficient indication of interest to merge upstart
support patches, including this sort
El Tue, 6 de May 2014 a las 8:41 PM, Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com
escribió:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
I can see your point that the future of upstart is possibly
unclear, but
my feeling is that if anyone filed a bug against a package
requesting
upstart support, that's sufficient
14 matches
Mail list logo
