Re: new committee members

2014-11-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Bdale Garbee wrote: > With the resignation of Russ and notice of impending resignation from > Colin, I believe we should begin the process of finding new members for > the committee. It has not been that long since the last nomimation and you might want to ping the last c

Re: [CTTE #746578] libpam-systemd to switch alternate dependency ordering

2014-11-17 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Charles" == Charles Plessy writes: Charles> Le Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:58:41AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a Charles> écrit : >> >> Specifically, I would like to ask Debian Developers to contribute >> (positively) to TC discussions when relevant, in order to help >> the

Bug#769972: New CTTE members

2014-11-17 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Works for me. I like the "start considering" wording, too, as opposed > to "closing the call for nominations". Good thought. OK. I've written the draft of this here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/debian-ctte.git/tree/769972_new_ctte_members

Bug#769972: New CTTE members

2014-11-17 Thread Bdale Garbee
Don Armstrong writes: > Package: tech-ctte > Severity: minor > User: tech-c...@packages.debian.org > Usertag: consensus-seeking > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Bdale Garbee wrote: >> I see that Don has added an agenda item about this to our next IRC >> meeting scheduled for 4 December, but I don't reall

Bug#769972: New CTTE members

2014-11-17 Thread Don Armstrong
Package: tech-ctte Severity: minor User: tech-c...@packages.debian.org Usertag: consensus-seeking On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Bdale Garbee wrote: > I see that Don has added an agenda item about this to our next IRC > meeting scheduled for 4 December, but I don't really want to wait until > then to start

Re: new committee members

2014-11-17 Thread Andreas Barth
* Bdale Garbee (bd...@gag.com) [141117 20:59]: > I would like to propose that we issue a call for nominations to the > project, similar to the one we used last time. I'd like to do that this > week. We can discuss here by email and/or in our IRC meeting on the 4th > issues like what we should loo

Re: [CTTE #746578] libpam-systemd to switch alternate dependency ordering

2014-11-17 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 11/16/2014 10:28 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > In the absence of that, it seems quite understandable to > interpret this as yet another attempt by the TC to undermine systemd. It's nothing but that exactly that, not more, not less. The decision which init system Debian would use was already made a

new committee members

2014-11-17 Thread Bdale Garbee
With the resignation of Russ and notice of impending resignation from Colin, I believe we should begin the process of finding new members for the committee. I see that Don has added an agenda item about this to our next IRC meeting scheduled for 4 December, but I don't really want to wait until th

Re: Resigning from the TC

2014-11-17 Thread Bdale Garbee
Bdale Garbee writes: > I'm intentionally not making this a public message ... I clearly failed to adequately edit the message headers before sending. Oh well. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Resigning from the TC

2014-11-17 Thread Bdale Garbee
Colin Watson writes: > I hereby declare my intent to resign from the Debian Technical > Committee. The Constitution doesn't really have a clear procedure for > handling resignations here; I expect the TC will want to appoint a new > member, which I appreciate might take a while. Subject to advi

Re: [CTTE #746578] libpam-systemd to switch alternate dependency ordering

2014-11-17 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:58:41AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > Specifically, I would like to ask Debian Developers to contribute > (positively) to TC discussions when relevant, in order to help the TC > get a complete understanding of the issues, their consequences, and > possible resoluti

Re: [CTTE #746578] libpam-systemd to switch alternate dependency ordering

2014-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, I think that everyone will agree that we are having a big crisis about the role of the TC in Debian. What saddens me deeply is how some of us framed this as a "Debian vs the Technical Committee" fight. The Technical Committee _is_ Debian. If we feel it's malfunctionning, it's our problem as De