Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789

2014-12-10 Thread Don Armstrong
This is just a draft: ==BEGIN== In 770789, the Technical Committee was asked to override the decision of upstream and the maintainer of df to not include i in the units output when asked for IEC output (2^10). The CTTE declines to override the decision of the maintainer and upstream. ==END==

Bug#762194: Initial draft of affirming transition to systemd as default for #762194

2014-12-10 Thread Don Armstrong
I've attached below an initial draft of an option for #762194 for discussion. Steve indicated that he wanted to revise/contribute to this option, so I don't believe we should call for votes until that happens. ==BEGIN== In #762194, the Technical Committee was asked to use its power under §6.1.4

Bug#762194: Initial draft of affirming transition to systemd as default for #762194

2014-12-10 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:10:10 -0800 Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: I've attached below an initial draft of an option for #762194 for discussion. A few comments below. ==BEGIN== In #762194, the Technical Committee was asked to use its power under §6.1.4 to override the decision of the

Bug#762194: Initial draft of affirming transition to systemd as default for #762194

2014-12-10 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Josh Triplett wrote: This doesn't seem like an accurate description of #762194. #762194 was not specificlaly a request for the TC to override the maintainers of init to change the alternative order. Well, more specifically, it was to override the transition plan (namely,

Bug#762194: Initial draft of affirming transition to systemd as default for #762194

2014-12-10 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:35:32 -0800 Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Josh Triplett wrote: This doesn't seem like an accurate description of #762194. #762194 was not specificlaly a request for the TC to override the maintainers of init to change the alternative order.

Bug#762194: Initial draft of affirming transition to systemd as default for #762194

2014-12-10 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Josh Triplett wrote: I'd used the Technical Committee considered rather intentionally in the wording I suggested, to avoid any of the controversy around was asked from the previous last decision. Not going to push for that, just pointing it out as intentional. We really

Bug#762194: Initial draft of affirming transition to systemd as default for #762194

2014-12-10 Thread Josh Triplett
Thanks for the updates; the current version in debian-ctte git (as of commit e43bfb9cd1f6316ed01a58a4a248e82fc3825850) looks good to me. - Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789

2014-12-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:13:30AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: This is just a draft: ==BEGIN== In 770789, the Technical Committee was asked to override the decision of upstream and the maintainer of df to not include i in the units output when asked for IEC output (2^10). The CTTE

Bug#762194: Initial draft of affirming transition to systemd as default for #762194

2014-12-10 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: 4. The CTTE appreciates the effort of Debian contributors to mitigate any issues with the transition by: a) Providing a fallback boot entry for sysvinit when systemd is the default init in grub (#757298) b) Developing a mechanism to warn on

Bug#762194: Initial draft of affirming transition to systemd as default for #762194

2014-12-10 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Nikolaus Rath wrote: Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: 4. The CTTE appreciates the effort of Debian contributors to mitigate any issues with the transition by: a) Providing a fallback boot entry for sysvinit when systemd is the default init in grub