On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:40:00AM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
Steve, in one of the TC meetings last year, you made the claim that the
policy process was not a rough consensus process.
I believe this was:
vorlon keithp: our policy process isn't based on rough
consensus, but on a
[I think that what follows is entirely redundant with what I wrote earlier.]
Le Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:32:58PM -0400, Sam Hartman a écrit :
Steve claimed that the policy process is not a rough consensus process
and that the fact that Bill objected in-and-of-itself might be
sufficient to
hi, thanks for an excellent mail.
I've read it and agree with your analysis. To the best of my
understanding you were elaborating on what I wrote, not disagreeing with
it.
--Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Having reviewed the policy team's process.txt document and having
reviewed Charles's comments, I'm much less sanguine when I think about
the approach for resolving the menu system discussion that we discussed
last Thursday.
Keith may well have an approach that improves over both the status
Mehdi DOGGUY me...@dogguy.org writes:
Le 31 mars 2015 02:49, bjf...@gmail.com a écrit :
After explaining we have an impressive ratio of female to male
participants in the Debian project as a whole (not just technical),
your suggestion is to get more women involved generally with Debian
5 matches
Mail list logo
