Don == Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
Don On Sun, 16 Aug 2015, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
What about just adding Keith's proposal to the ballot, and let
the Condorcet magic act?
Don This has sort of been my plan; I just have not had enough spare
Don cycles in the
Hi Charles, and thanks for your feedback,
Le lundi, 17 août 2015, 21.25:59 Charles Plessy a écrit :
I think that option D has two fundamental flaws and I would like to
recommend the TC against voting for it.
* First, if it is voted, nothing will happen.
If the TC adopts option D, and if
Package: tech-ctte
Severity: normal
Hi all,
here's my understanding of the state of our Introduction of a formal
cloture vote procedure for the TC discussion.
In June 2014, in answer to a proposal from Ian to introduce a minimum
discussion period in the TC, Steve, referring to a previous TC
Le Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:54:50PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
3. We recommend that the maintainers of the 'menu' package update
that package to reflect this increased focus on .desktop files
by modifying the 'menu' package to use .desktop files for the
source
Package: tech-ctte
Severity: normal
Hi all,
here's my understanding of the state of our TC chair appointment
discussion.
In June 2014, in 21420.15439.20061.525...@chiark.greenend.org.uk, Ian
described a problem he wanted to see fixed in the constitution:
Le jeudi, 26 juin 2014, 16.29:19 Ian
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:28 -0700
with message-id 20150619142800.ga8...@qor.donarmstring.com
and subject line [CTTE #750135] Aptitude Project Maintainer
has caused the Debian Bug report #750135,
regarding Determine maintainer of aptitude package
to be marked as done.
This means that
Dear fellow TC members,
In the mood of tackling more of our old TC issues, I went ahead and
reviewed all threads in the bugreport. I've then opened new independent
bugs for all relevant issues, and commented the others below. For all
problems for which I haven't opened a bug, I would strongly
Package: tech-ctte
Severity: normal
Hi all,
here's my understanding of the state of our Fix duplicate section
numbering discussion: There are two A.1 sections in the current
constitution, the proposed solution is to renumber the first to A.0.
Ian wrote a full GR proposal in
Didier == Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org writes:
Didier Le lundi, 17 août 2015, 14.57:18 j'ai écrit :
Ian wrote a full GR proposal in
20996.60469.968631.307...@chiark.greenend.org.uk (
[636783_supermajority/propose-numberfix] in our git repository
and I've attached
Le lundi, 17 août 2015, 14.57:18 j'ai écrit :
Ian wrote a full GR proposal in
20996.60469.968631.307...@chiark.greenend.org.uk (
[636783_supermajority/propose-numberfix] in
our git repository and I've attached it to this mail) which addresses
this.
I realize that lifting the GR hammer to fix
Le jeudi, 30 août 2012, 13.29:57 Ian Jackson a écrit :
Stefano Zacchiroli writes (Re: Bug#686235: Committee list of
decisions on webpage is incomplete):
The bug title makes me believe I didn't convey the scope of my
comment well enough. I was referring specifically to the
_nontechnical_
Le mardi, 16 juin 2015, 10.54:02 Don Armstrong a écrit :
With this, the outcome is no longer in doubt, and option A has won. I
will announce and record the decision later today.
This was announced to debian-devel-announce in
20150619142800.ga8...@qor.donarmstring.com, and was published on the
12 matches
Mail list logo
